Which one takes more skill: Battlegrounds or Arena?
- Thread starter Neon
- Start date
Legacyshockz
Legend
arenas imo
Zehj
Legend
that's TAS so its set up frame by frame to be perfect but tech wise theres nothing too special going on there
you know theres a pretty big pro scene for ssbm
TBH4 - C9 Mango (Fox, Falcon) Vs. P4K EMP | Armada (Peach) SSBM Losers Semis - Smash Melee - YouTube
Gulbon
Legend
Battlegrounds focus on how well you can work as a large team, thus your individual choices aren't as important as say an Arena, where as an individual player, what you do matters a lot more to the outcome of the match.
Battlegrounds: Focus on what a large group of players can do in synergy to win, there's more room for error.
Arenas: Individual oriented fights where there's less room for error.
Skill in the battleground sense is defined by objectivity and teamwork, you don't have to be BiS or be very skilled to do well if you play objectively and with the team.
Skill in the arena sense is about actual player VS player and mastering your class to it's best ability, both gearwise, gameplay wise, and minmaxing your damage, burst, and survival.
From a teamwork perspective? Battlegrounds require more skill. One player isn't going to win the game.
From an actual PvP perspective? Arenas, your choice as one player matters a lot more.
Battlegrounds: Focus on what a large group of players can do in synergy to win, there's more room for error.
Arenas: Individual oriented fights where there's less room for error.
Skill in the battleground sense is defined by objectivity and teamwork, you don't have to be BiS or be very skilled to do well if you play objectively and with the team.
Skill in the arena sense is about actual player VS player and mastering your class to it's best ability, both gearwise, gameplay wise, and minmaxing your damage, burst, and survival.
From a teamwork perspective? Battlegrounds require more skill. One player isn't going to win the game.
From an actual PvP perspective? Arenas, your choice as one player matters a lot more.
OP
OP
Neon
666 god
pretty good points on both sides for the new thread so people can look at what people said on this one
Allybeboba
Legend
Of coarse making money takes skill. If it was easy, anyone could do it!
Steering back to topic. Arenas vs BGs are like comparing apples and oranges. Similar to comparing DPS and Heals. You just can't compare the two. They are two different things. Each requiring a different skill set.
Might as well ask. Who is smarter, a veteranian or an architect?
/cheers
Nodoka
Contributor
So how 10/15 people synergies with eachother is skill all of a sudden? >_>
LennywBT
SpeeDIO
Yes, go play a wargame with 10 people you've never known against a premade that has over 4+years of practice and knowledge of what they can achieve by giving ideas.
Nodoka
Contributor
Thats game knowledge.
LennywBT
SpeeDIO
Nodoka
Contributor
Pffft : P eat my socks
LennywBT
SpeeDIO
Nodoka
Contributor
lol
Aw I only get a lol? ; /
LennywBT
SpeeDIO
Pattern
Phoenix
Low level arena is too easy, the synergy and lineups are quickly created with non jaja players running a solid comp.
most 3s games in low brackets are cookie cutter, with less utility theres less room for interesting combos or clutch plays imo.
That being said 10v10 meta is also quite stale so meh. I would still swing towards the greater possibility of variability and the larger knowledge pool required to run a solid premade team than 3s team.
most 3s games in low brackets are cookie cutter, with less utility theres less room for interesting combos or clutch plays imo.
That being said 10v10 meta is also quite stale so meh. I would still swing towards the greater possibility of variability and the larger knowledge pool required to run a solid premade team than 3s team.