Mangone said:Would a dual wielding warrior spec'd with Juggernaut be a bad idea?
Falkor said:always been out of reach
Falkor said:no more imba than juggernaut lol. if any1 of the specs needs mobility its prot anyways since no hamstring in defensive stance, and a large majority don't take piercing howl either. prot is the easiest spec to be kited in, especially since 3.1. arms has juggernaut, fury at least has imp. intercept again, but prot has jackspit to help.
prot warriors are still pretty sick when played offensively. conc blow, revenge stuns, shield slam..all of which will crit for well over 1k, and if u glyphed like me then free heroic strikes that can get 1k+ too. plus the added armor and mitigation of a shield. use of shield block, last stand, etc. definitely still a competitive spec imo.
Competitive? More like the best spec for warriors. Warbringer is WAY more imba than Juggernaut. Juggernaut allows charge in combat. Warbringer does that, adds on snare removal and allows charge/intercept from any stance.Falkor said:no more imba than juggernaut lol. if any1 of the specs needs mobility its prot anyways since no hamstring in defensive stance, and a large majority don't take piercing howl either. prot is the easiest spec to be kited in, especially since 3.1. arms has juggernaut, fury at least has imp. intercept again, but prot has jackspit to help.
prot warriors are still pretty sick when played offensively. conc blow, revenge stuns, shield slam..all of which will crit for well over 1k, and if u glyphed like me then free heroic strikes that can get 1k+ too. plus the added armor and mitigation of a shield. use of shield block, last stand, etc. definitely still a competitive spec imo.
Alkaholic said:Competitive? More like the best spec for warriors. Warbringer is WAY more imba than Juggernaut. Juggernaut allows charge in combat. Warbringer does that, adds on snare removal and allows charge/intercept from any stance.
Speak for urself, 69 twink, here I come...Taitaih said:Unfortunately it's just out of our reach