Since you have to shift out to heal, you lose the stam-armor benefit, as Hurrx mentioned before. They also don't have the dps a prot warrior can pull in if the druid is in bear form either with only mangle, maul, and swipe for offense.
silly that hass still trolls after i smashed him on the ruin forums everyday. aint that right soldier?
Just roll boomkin fc![]()
Feral FC, have him help gank EFC before making the pass to him.
You could apply the same logic to excluding paladin FCs on the "no more than 2 of a class" rule. Exceptions can be made since rules are left up to the guilds in question obviously.
this isn't a no more than 2 of a class rule, this is no more than 2 stealthies....Since the 2 of each class rule will still apply, then 2 stealthies and a druid FC should be negotiable seeing as the FC will never be utilizing stealth to gank the EFC
And if the 2 of stealth classes rule was abolished, would teams really roll with 2 rogues 2 feral druids? I don't see any use of that rule given the 2 of ea class is still in place.
pugs till debuff = druid pugs after debuff= hpallah
premades = war hands down
pugs till debuff = druid
premades = war hands down
I love how everybody talks about the *rules* of premades yet the only place where these rules are said are in the WT premade thread. Meaning for games again WT.
Warrior FCs are garbage
Paladin FCs can still heal, bubble, loh, etc, while druid FC's won't even go on offense - I see the analogy you are making, but it pales in comparison.
Which do you think will be more viable? Granted the 10% armor increase will be awesome, but as a prot war in defensive stance I'm still rocking roughly 60% damage reduction, which seems pretty ridiculous. So will druids honestly be that much better, and go back to the ol' days of Druids holding down the FC slot?