10-19 The Official Twink Cup 2016 Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I feel like this wouldnt have been a problem at all if committee members like lindenkron were so aggressive towards people just raising opinions, you're gonna need the communities opinions to make rules better not just fire back like there is nothing wrong
 
Everyone can get behind you three for pushing the tourney forward. The issues arising are a result of the entitlement you feel in said role. You stepped into the ring so take your shots.
Equalize gear.
Stop trashing Myrm's name. You have no idea what his situation is IRL.
Value the community more than your stream.
Involve every team in the rule consensus.
 
Pizza said:
As a team, we don't support the direction that the new management has taken the tournament in regards to how the rule committee was selected
Click to expand...

Hello there, Pizza. I'm giving my opinion on that quote. This action seems to be taken swiftly, in my perspective. You, as the others here could give your opinions on the matter. If every team acted like this, there would be no tournament in the first place. Not agreeing with the rules is something natural, you can argue about it, and i do believe, with the argument given (bad/good) the rules committee should see reason(to not accept/accept and change).

Pizza said:
and how some of the oldest and most dedicated members of the community are being treated.
Click to expand...

Secondly, i do not think most of us are mistreating some of the oldest members of the community. Maybe that could have been said based on enchants being removed, and peoples opinion's about grandfathered gear being removed as well. Honestly, if all comes to balancing the games, there should be no thing as a team being advantageous. Even Blizzard, treats endgame in the same manners. If you take a look at the obtained PvP Gear, it is all equal, and it does not allow a specific piece of gear to have more stats than another. By finalizing that point, i can say that some of the oldest, and most committed players are not being mistreated, but instead, they are being equalized, for the sake of the Tournament.

With all the respect, I think you should put your team back on the play.
 
Without SR there might as well not even be a Twink Cup tbh. The main reason most people want to compete is to wreck SR this year. Which would have been even sweeter of a victory now that x2 boomy is banned and they have to use that shit FC.
 
As far as people being treated poorly who gives a shit. If you can't handle taking shit from people after 2-10 years in the 19 bracket idk how the hell you survived this long. Also would the rules really have changed if Pizza was on the rules committee? it would still be a majority vote and I doubt any of the rules being voted on came down to a swing vote.
 
LennywBT said:
Hello there, Pizza. I'm giving my opinion on that quote. This action seems to be taken swiftly, in my perspective. You, as the others here could give your opinions on the matter. If every team acted like this, there would be no tournament in the first place. Not agreeing with the rules is something natural, you can argue about it, and i do believe, with the argument given (bad/good) the rules committee should see reason(to not accept/accept and change).



Secondly, i do not think most of us are mistreating some of the oldest members of the community. Maybe that could have been said based on enchants being removed, and peoples opinion's about grandfathered gear being removed as well. Honestly, if all comes to balancing the games, there should be no thing as a team being advantageous. Even Blizzard, treats endgame in the same manners. If you take a look at the obtained PvP Gear, it is all equal, and it does not allow a specific piece of gear to have more stats than another. By finalizing that point, i can say that some of the oldest, and most committed players are not being mistreated, but instead, they are being equalized, for the sake of the Tournament.

With all the respect, I think you should put your team back on the play.
Click to expand...

Highly doubt this has anything to do with enchants at all, but this as a whole. How decisions has been made, how certain people are getting treated and how other people are acting. I do think that the way this "Committee" was created just topped everything. I also think some people are perhaps a bit annoyed with how Myrms name is getting "used", whether you like him or not he has done a ton of work for the bracket in the past, along with creating the Twink Cup in the first place. Some people has just been to fed up with all the bullshit at this point and personally I am more than happy I have nothing at all to do with the Twink Cup this year.
 
bolt said:
the committee thing is a seedless lie - they claim that 7 people had a vote but thats simply not true

insider information from GSC's secret spy (dan) has thrown this claim out
Click to expand...
vote about what u buzzkill
 
Pizza said:
It saddens me to say this, but Skill Ratio no longer plans to compete in the TC this year. As a team, we don't support the direction that the new management has taken the tournament in regards to how the rule committee was selected and how some of the oldest and most dedicated members of the community are being treated.

We want to thank everyone for all the hard work they have put into the tournament and hope nothing but the best for all those involved. Good luck to all the teams competing.

I have gone and removed our team from the first post.
Click to expand...
D O D G E
 
Fancy said:
SR pulled the biggest doj in their history ;P

But srsly, this is horrible. We are punishing the tinks whom have played for YEARS.

I respect Pizza being outraged by the result of the committee.

Toys, any items in bags or anything other than Healthstones and Runecloth Bandages are BANNED. Means standard is banned. PLEASE THINK THROUGH THE RULES. Could also take this as not being allowed to swap sets.
Click to expand...
Standard is unfair to those newer players that weren't around to farm the honour points.
 
Shamatix said:
Highly doubt this has anything to do with enchants at all, but this as a whole. How decisions has been made, how certain people are getting treated and how other people are acting. I do think that the way this "Committee" was created just topped everything. I also think some people are perhaps a bit annoyed with how Myrms name is getting "used", whether you like him or not he has done a ton of work for the bracket in the past, along with creating the TC in the first place. Some people has just been to fed up with all the bullshit at this point and personally I am more than happy I have nothing at all to do with the TC this year.
Click to expand...

I definitely do agree, Myrm said it would be this way. You cannot pick up several people and argue with them about this year's TC, every competing guild Must have a say. It is after all the best way to put it. @Conq, and whoever is maintaining this, there must be changes made. Every team has to chose one representative, based on (the person's availability, judging, and experience, chosen by the team).
 
Keep watching the thread guys, the ''committee'' will now bend rules again so they fit SR's standards :Kappa:
 
I think we are on the same page now ^_^

LennywBT said:
I definitely do agree, Myrm said it would be this way. You cannot pick up several people and argue with them about this year's TC, every competing guild Must have a say. It is after all the best way to put it. @Conq, and whoever is maintaining this, there must be changes made. Every team has to chose one representative, based on (the person's availability, judging, and experience, chosen by the team).
Click to expand...

Shamatix said:
I really cant see the idea behind handpicking a couple few represents from a couple of teams and not all teams. I feel like you either have to pick a leader from each team or no teams at all, not something in between.
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top