The NO.1 F2P PvE Rankings ，Basically all the achievements done

Preeztess said:
I did pay in the past, as did you. Are you saying you started playing WoW with a free trial account and never had a a paid account?
Click to expand...

He's not saying that, He's saying you're using your P2P account to boost your F2P Achievements so it shouldn't count when RANKING your F2P because you're crutching on your P2P's Achievements. Should your stats count against people who's achievements were only obtained by a F2P character? No.

But it's not like achievements matter anyway. I just like shooting people down who like to say they're #1 just because it makes them feel good. You're basically the pre-patch hunter and post-patch holydin of achievements, Of coarse you have a lot of them, you're being carried but you're bragging about it lol.
 
I wasn't bragging about it, just showing the pointlessness of achievement points post-patch. As lofi said in another post, achievement points can't be used to rank anyone and neither can mounts/pets.

Whatever, I wasn't on the rankings before the patch and don't really care. I'm still F2P for life.
 
It's not pointless to compare them. You simply exclude all characters with achievements that can't be obtained by F2P. It's not the first time a 20 has been removed for that reason.
 
Yes, because exploring Northrend and having a p2p title/mount makes me a better/worse player! But I guess this isn't a BETTER PLAYER rankings, just a more time to waste on pointless vanity points ranking.
 
It's no more or less pointless than it ever was. I never mentioned anything about you being good or bad as a player.
 
Don't even know why Preeztess is getting so defensive over this. You say you're not "bragging" but a few posts ago you said:

Preeztess @ Aerie Peak - Game Guide - World of Warcraft

Preeztess:

6115 Achievement Points
Mounts: 52
Pets: 168

I win. :)
Click to expand...

Seems like you really care about what others think of your "achievements' in this game.

As for the back-and-forth about achievement points/etc..... some people will want to compare - whether for the pure sake of comparing, or feeling they've "achieved" more than other players - or for any number of completely different reasons. And at the same time, some people won't feel it necessary/want to compare at all. Kale is being logical here, but seems like Preeztess can't think properly because they got called out and now they're feeling butthurt.
 
I think when the achievement points and champs/mounts are made acount-wide, most Twinks will feel upset rather than unbothered... With almost all the time and efforts you devoted becoming meaningless anymore, you don't even have a chance to keep the shining armory page as a monument...Of course you could restrict the achievement panel to display only your own points, but all the "account achievenment''(with a blue frame) will still be displayed, like HK titles, champs, mounts.etc. And the F2P twinks linked to P2P account will lost more... think about farming the champions with 1/10000 drop rates, and your P2P accounts have already got all of them from AH... I believe at least some twinks will be too frustrated to move on...
 
championlo said:
Now chinese server is also 4.3.4

毕ç¦￾剑 @ å￾¤å°”丹 - 游æˆ￾ - é*”兽世界

Achievement Points 3905
Companions Collected 63
Mounts Collected 25
Exalted Reputations 24
Titles Obtained 5
Quests Completed 861
Dailies Completed 1113

View attachment 254
Click to expand...

On a first look.... I saw... he has at least,610 + Achievement Points that we can't have because of our restrictions. ... So .. just another bragging thread.

EDIT :

Aradiel said:
[Tricks and Treats of the Cataclysm](It seem cannot be completed)
-Only possible for alliance due to phasing.
Click to expand...

What about Deepholm, Temple of Earth ? ... Is this phasing... about that too ? :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top