If you voted Positive Feedback then I'd suggest you watch this video:
Positive and negative feedback can both be effective. It all depends on the person delivering and receiving the feedback and the environment and circumstance in which the feedback is being given.
imo healthy feedback in general requires both positive and negative feedback, although perhaps a more praise-in-public and criticize-in-private approach. negative feedback(properly given, this would probably be better termed as constructive criticism) is important if you want your subject to improve in areas where he is lacking, but when you give someone negative feedback in public, he's going to receive a negative stigma in his peers' eyes that won't go away easily, whereas if you give that same feedback in private, assuming he's willing to fix his problems he's going to work harder to improve without the added baggage of social degradation.
Probably 3/4 of that video was him explaining and giving random examples of regression to the mean, lol
His opinion by the end , the tl;dr if you will, is basically that all the case studies revolving around the differences between positive and negative feedback are flawed and are caused by regression to the mean rather than the feedback itself. I chuckled at the end when he said that positive feedback may work out better in the long run, although all of his given statistics suggested otherwise.
Dude is GREAT at saying very little with lots of words.
imo healthy feedback in general requires both positive and negative feedback, although perhaps a more praise-in-public and criticize-in-private approach. negative feedback(properly given, this would probably be better termed as constructive criticism) is important if you want your subject to improve in areas where he is lacking, but when you give someone negative feedback in public, he's going to receive a negative stigma in his peers' eyes that won't go away easily, whereas if you give that same feedback in private, assuming he's willing to fix his problems he's going to work harder to improve without the added baggage of social degradation.
Of course, the more egotistical the subject, the less the praise-in-public criticize-in-private approach is going to work.
Negative feedback can be useful, although I wouldn't call it 'negative feedback'. But just because you're telling someone that they did something wrong, doesn't mean that you have to be disrespectful.
No that is just feedback. Feedback is the evaluation of a persons actions. If the actions were wrong, the feedback will be 'what you did was wrong/bad'. There are however many different ways to do this in respectful manner.Telling someone they did something wrong is negative feedback, as it is indeed feedback and it is indeed negative.