It's that time again - Best of list

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jetlife said:
they have done this previously, its just alot more time consuming to do then the basic lists that you have already seen in this thread....

the last time it was done, people categorized Alpha, beta, so on, and then had paragraphed the explanation for the level of skill associated with the categorization. this takes so much time tho no one really wants to do it when 19s are actually popping alot, people wanna do the quick shit and continue playing
Click to expand...

http://www.twinkinfo.com/forums/f12/sax-twink-list-4-a-63518/

this thread?

Edit: if u do mean this thread there is no explanation for individual players, its just saying "alpha is the best" and shit like that
 
Jetlife said:
no one is going to put the time in to do individual player explanations thats even more time consuming tbh but maybe someone will feel like doing it one day
Click to expand...

thats because no one can prove that their list isn't bias because there is nothing that can differentiate 2 top players of a class in a bracket where classes only have like 5 buttons. the only thing that would separate them is the consistency to perform at their best.
 
Priest: Quara / Fortt / Patton / Healßot
Mage: Sheep / IIce
Rogue: Salt / Cirran
Shaman: Ibehealin (Ibeshockin)
Paladin: Vegansown / Sylvatic
Warrior: Anar / PPopperrrrrr
Warlock: KPopper / Drayner
Hunter: Silinrul / Annoying
Druid: Marcey / Painaid

If you didn't make my list you clearly are not good at twinking and you need to practice more to get better. What one person thinks of you matters like so much. If you are not in these best of lists you should quit or level because you are not good.


If you've read this post, I'm sorry for slapping you in the face with sarcasm.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why dont you guys do like a player of the week list for each faction instead of the best list. And then after majority of the community agrees on the list, those on the list will be grouped for a 10v10 warsong
 
Bmac said:
thats because no one can prove that their list isn't bias because there is nothing that can differentiate 2 top players of a class in a bracket where classes only have like 5 buttons. the only thing that would separate them is the consistency to perform at their best.
Click to expand...

ye maybe
 
Swoops said:
http://www.twinkinfo.com/forums/f12/truth-about-19-community-july-2013-a-50486/

This is probably about as close as you'll get to what you're looking for.
Click to expand...

yea thats not what i want, thats not a list of who's best and why thats just descriptions of players.

im just making a point that no ones list has ever had any proof to back it up, so theyre all meaningless. and there wont ever be any proof because there is no difference between two top players of a class in this bracket.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Godcomplex said:
how would u prove that someone is a good player? do u want ppl to provide a video of every player on their list
Click to expand...

lol? if someone had to just put a recording of what a person does on their class in a game because they dont know what actually makes them better than another person would only prove my point further. i just want people to say what one person actually does better than another. does one warrior spam rend on everyone and execute better than others? does a brewmaster hit keg smash harder and spam barrels more?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do remember somebody did a best of list a while back that used a number system (1-10). Best scores were 9.6, 9.7, 9.8 etc. Most scores fell between 7.5 and 8.5 probably. This person then wrote 2/3 sentences for each twink that gave reasoning for the score he chose - the pros/cons of their gameplay etc. I forget who made their list this way but it was very thorough.
 
Bmac said:
lol? if someone had to just put a recording of what a person does on their class in a game because they dont know what actually makes them better than another person would only prove my point further. i just want people to say what one person actually does better than another. does one warrior spam rend on everyone and execute better than others? does a brewmaster hit keg smash harder and spam barrels more?
Click to expand...

I don't know who you are and doubt you know who I am so this comment has nothing to do with us individually. But....if you think that's all that differentiates players then you truly have no idea what it means to be the best.

Players that do what they need to do to help their team win are the best. Nobody ever mentions winning, when it's really all about winning. Yes just like the NFL there are some great players on bad teams and some weak ones on good ones. But the GREATEST players all share winning in common. Because they do what they need to do to make wins happen.
 
MYT said:
I don't know who you are and doubt you know who I am so this comment has nothing to do with us individually. But....if you think that's all that differentiates players then you truly have no idea what it means to be the best.

Players that do what they need to do to help their team win are the best. Nobody ever mentions winning, when it's really all about winning. Yes just like the NFL there are some great players on bad teams and some weak ones on good ones. But the GREATEST players all share winning in common. Because they do what they need to do to make wins happen.
Click to expand...

ok. put the "best" player on the worst team and if he loses he is not the best anymore according to you? and what does somebody do to help their team win as an individual class? they don't make mistakes and are consistent. what you said makes no sense at all. "Players that do what they need to do to help their team win are the best." thats called playing the game lmfao.

Edit: do you mean players that can adapt to situations? like im honestly trying to understand what ur saying to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well clearly we have a different perspective on it - and unfortunately I think a ton of the bracket shares your perspective because they've never been in a position to make their team a winner by their own efforts. Combined with these being a popularity contest for many voters and that's why nobody respects the results.

Like I said - these lists won't change even if zero people on then are on the team that wins the cup.
 
Interesting. How do you decide if someone is the best? It's a shame to see no familiar names on these lists :(
 
Pizza said:
Druid:
Resto - Pizzã
Boomkin - Pizzã/Ssjkøku/Sorryboutit
Guardian - Darkchewie/Harvestlord
Feral - N/A
Hunter: Nettie/Getfotmdxoxo
Mage: Grizzlefoot/Fearthebuns
Monk: Curleyrollsu/Skeezin
Rogue: Bigmoranx/Saxxon
Shaman: Dasfizzla/Yowzamvp
Paladin: Kancer/Koncentrate
Priest: Tyronebbc/Livingførce
Warrior: Lukenukem/Randylayhee
Warlock: Yøuredead

Active as of 2/23/15.
Click to expand...

Yowza played like 3 games, curley isn't active, nettie isn't active, barb isn't active, and Kancer has yet to play a full Wsg in WoD
 
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Top