is it me

[oosstt]

Making a 24 is NEVER "hard"... The weakest 24 is still stronger than the strongest 20. 24s CAN just lock exp at 20, and use f2p limitations. But they don't because they need the clutch. If you're here because you love twinking and want an active bracket, yet don't use the limitations, you're here to simply face roll, and NOT for a challenge, which is what pvp is about in it's entirety.

Regardless, 24 will never be enough to win games if most of the 24s don't try to learn. Just just pre made, fuck them, and move on. Because they most likely won't stop, because 24 isn't enough for them to just win, so why would they nerf themselves...?

 

[oosstt]

ik there isnt a f2ptwinks bracket neither p2ptwinks bracket but if there was it would cease this conflict.
what blizz intended and what happens in the game is very diferent.
ofc we all know blizz wont do such a thing, we have to live with each other.

we could make f2ptwinks and p2ptwinks(50%) happy if each one had its own bracket, f2ps cant move to another bracket unless blizz changes starter edition, and ofc p2ptwinks wont try to make their own active bracket.

Mission Impossible, so all that is left to do is rant, qq and hope for blizz to make it more balanced btw each like in 5.3

If they did separate the brackets, the 24 bracket would have que times just as long as any other bracket, because 20s make the bracket possible.

That being said, I support this totally.

 

[killwill]

if they seperate bgs which i dont support nothing will be solved. atm damage is too high and battle fatique is retarded. with the amount of dpsers in game, bgs are not fun. in real 5.3 was the best patch i ever saw in f2p history.

 

[samscraft]

Ye, when you dont have any arguments anymore the discussion has no use. i also have a p2p in this bracket, i dont have any problems with p2ps, i have problems with ppl who complain about something they also do (and try to hide it), its called pathetic.

"twinking as a whole" ? twinking would still be possible in all brackets, but most twinks wont have any challenges, they want to farm undergeared noobs. Dont blame f2p twinks for that.

Im pretty sure you reported me to the mods, but you know what? If i get a ban for using harsh words to point out that you write bullsh^t i can live with the ban.
I wish more ppl would have the balls to say something like this, but i understand these people. Write stupid rubbish all day and u dont get a ban, use one single harsh word to point out the persons who talk rubbish in every single thread and you get a ban.

Try to hide it? look when i made this thread you blind arsehole, and then look when i upgraded, thx and goodbye you reject, now get out of my thread and just kill yourself.

 

[madhombre]

you are living proof that this bracket draws twinks from others, just for the activity.

lots of people wanted 80s to stay in wrath gear, did that stop you? lots of 80s hate mages, and rets, did that stop you?

FYI: i have 19s, 70s, and an 85. in all those brackets (as you well know), everyone is equal. i'd love f2ps to be on par with p2p, but they won't pay, and i'm not going to nerf my self.

like you did't in the 80s bracket.

i'm making a 15 rogue atm, if i get my arse handed to me by a 19, i know i chose to lock at 15.

they choose ​not pay.

wow, look:
you think i dont support 80s games in full wotlk gear? i made several threads on twinkinfo in the 80s section about full wotlk geared bgs/arenas, i managed a few 2v2 games in full wotlk gear and i said often that mop gear ruined the bracket so check your facts before you want to blame me.
and ppl hate 80 mages/rets?
in cata they hated frostmages, i never was frost. they didnt hate retpalas because they were weak in cata compared to other classes. now in mop, ppl who hate mages never met a rogue or boomkin. so, what do we see? a person who lies and does not have any kind of knowledge about the 80s bracket.

 

[Kilda]

I think that's enough now..

/locked