Good Idea or Bad Idea?

[Sketchbag]

To play both factions. I normally build clones of each class I play. One on each faction. Some* days I'll switch to the losing faction to try and balance out games. Other* days I'll log to the winning side because losing just isn't "fun" when it gets to double digits for games lost. Also, I'll log to the other side if I see some friends online that I would enjoy healing. Lastly*, I'll log to the other side just to spite someone who macro spams me in a negative way.

*Rare occasion

 

[#ko]

i have multiple toons on both factions... just play whichever u feel like playing at the time and not worry about what other ppl think =)

 

[Zatox]

Id say its a good idea. Balancing games is what makes people continue to queue. Many times I've quit queueing because horde has 5 resto druids 5 games in a row, vice versa, or teams aren't playing as a team etc

 

[Mocha]

I like playing one faction. It prevents the whole logrolling / lossdodging thing.

 

[Mesikämmen]

Good to have a lot of tinkes, to select exactly the twink you feel like playing at a given moment Also, having duplicates is really cool because you can still play the role/spec/class you wish, even if you feel urged to log to the losing side. Though, I have to say I always rather play my horde druid than alli, because of having so much more gear and shitz... And it being my main twink ofc

Oh and also what you said, you can also log to another side to play with friends, that's one great thing to be able to do!

 

[Trialdruid]

I think this idea is just fine, I usually play 1 on winning side then 1 on losing side or 2 on winning side then two on losing side etc

 

[Karmaz]

I only play the most OP classes period.

#19catabalancedruid

w8 wat

 

[Nakedplumber]

Just play orgrimmar

 

[Sketchbag]

I only play the most OP classes period.

#19catabalancedruid

w8 wat

fair enough!

 

[Zethax]

I balance in my own way, sometimes I log my shitty geared rogue from BC because im bored, sure that drags the horde team abit down ... on a more serious note it would be nice to gear it some day

 

[Sneaky]

As long as you don't switch to the winning side all the time, it's a good idea.

I'm probably going to have 2 monks, one on each faction.

 

[#ko]

As long as you don't switch to the winning side all the time, it's a good idea.

I'm probably going to have 2 monks, one on each faction.

gimme ur info i wanna play munk

 

[Dorigon]

gimme ur info i wanna play munk

"gimme ur info i wanna hack monk"

 

[Tombrady]

As long as you don't switch to the winning side all the time, it's a good idea.

I'm probably going to have 2 monks, one on each faction.

copy cat

 

[Dorigon]

Why would this be a bad idea? It increases flexibility within the community.

 

[Lejn]

"gimme ur info i wanna hack monk"

If he gets the info he doesn't need to hack it anymore, no?

 

[Dorigon]

If he gets the info he doesn't need to hack it anymore, no?

Only if Sneaky repeatedly changes the info, like last time.

 

[Curley]

Wherever i queue wins.

 

[Sneaky]

"gimme ur info i wanna hack monk"

Ironically, I just got DC'd and locked out of my account, and the hacker is on it somehow.

 

[Solipsist]

Wherever i queue wins.

It all makes sense now.