EU+US F2P picture thread

[Mythic Al]

"Starter Edition Twink."

Oh...

Starter Edition Twink
I prefer it over f2p cuz some f2ps have bought store mounts....

What's wrong with buying store mounts?

 

[Conzil]

see? SEE !?

I done TOLD yall not to do this

Its catching on, in a few months no one will be confused
We can't be scared of change
[doublepost=1581363855,1581363825][/doublepost]

Oh, so I guess you and Brihan don't count as SETs then.

Im not f2p, im SET
[doublepost=1581363967][/doublepost]

What's wrong with buying store mounts?

Nothing, but thats why I don't like calling it f2p

 

[ohti]

Im not f2p, im SET

No you're not. I've seen screenshots of you two boosting yourselves with high levels.

 

[Mythic Al]

Nothing, but thats why I don't like calling it f2p

Ok, I see your point. But it's going to be hard for this old goat to change...

No you're not. I've seen screenshots of you two boosting yourselves with high levels.

I think that's the point he is trying to make.

From his perspective: the title "F2P" should only apply to purists who don't buy anything from the store, or use main account with 120s to boost achievements and the like...

 

[Conzil]

No you're not. I've seen screenshots of you two boosting yourselves with high levels.

m8, u mixing it up
SET is just starter edition twink, so u can boost yourself, u can buy store mounts, u just on a starter edition acc

 

[Chops]

*grumbles in Boomer*

 

[ohti]

m8, u mixing it up
SET is just starter edition twink, so u can boost yourself, u can buy store mounts, u just on a starter edition acc

You right, my bad.
Still, terminology invented for the sake of cluttering things more than they already are.

 

[Mythic Al]

Yes, I could also see the counter-point. It might get kind of wonky differentiating between who might have used a 120 to snag an achievement or item and who has remained a beacon of "F2Purity".

 

[Chops]

It's a distinction without a difference

 

[Mythic Al]

It's a distinction without a difference

Let's not start the debate on whether we should be calling F2Ps twinks to begin with...

 

[Kaxle]

 

[ohti]

Let's not start the debate on whether we should be calling F2Ps twinks to begin with...

There are veterans, pure f2ps, and linked f2ps. End of discussion.

If we want to get real anal about it we can put the pure f2ps that have purchased things from the Blizzard store etc in the same camp as linked rather than pure.
[doublepost=1581364866,1581364817][/doublepost]

View attachment 14572

He already beat you to it. Lol

 

[Conzil]

From his perspective: the title "F2P" should only apply to purists who don't buy anything from the store, or use main account with 120s to boost achievements and the like...

I don't wanna add a new term, I just wanna replace f2p with SET. No one cares if someone spent money. It's the account status that matters

 

[Mythic Al]

...If we want to get real anal about it we can put the pure f2ps that have purchased things from the Blizzard store etc in the same camp as linked rather than pure...

Aww, I'm now an outcast...

 

[Kaxle]

He already beat you to it. Lol

There goes my 5min in paint

 

[ohti]

Aww, I'm now an outcast...

Don't worry, my f2ps are linked too.

 

[Conzil]

There are veterans, pure f2ps, and linked f2ps. End of discussion.

u mean Vet, SET, Linked SET?

 

[Mythic Al]

Don't worry, my f2ps are linked too.

Cosmetics ≠ Heirloom Necklace though...

 

[ohti]

u mean Vet, SET, Linked SET?

No.

Cosmetics ≠ Heirloom Necklace though...

It's okay they're just jealous of this swagger. Flex on fellow "corrupt" one.

 

[Conzil]

@Kaxle