EU+US F2P picture thread

see? SEE !?

I done TOLD yall not to do this

Its catching on, in a few months no one will be confused
We can't be scared of change
[doublepost=1581363855,1581363825][/doublepost]
Oh, so I guess you and Brihan don't count as SETs then. :Kappa:

Im not f2p, im SET
[doublepost=1581363967][/doublepost]
What's wrong with buying store mounts? :oops:

Nothing, but thats why I don't like calling it f2p
 
Nothing, but thats why I don't like calling it f2p

Ok, I see your point. But it's going to be hard for this old goat to change...

No you're not. I've seen screenshots of you two boosting yourselves with high levels.

I think that's the point he is trying to make.

From his perspective: the title "F2P" should only apply to purists who don't buy anything from the store, or use main account with 120s to boost achievements and the like...
 
m8, u mixing it up
SET is just starter edition twink, so u can boost yourself, u can buy store mounts, u just on a starter edition acc
You right, my bad.
Still, terminology invented for the sake of cluttering things more than they already are.
 
Yes, I could also see the counter-point. It might get kind of wonky differentiating between who might have used a 120 to snag an achievement or item and who has remained a beacon of "F2Purity".
 
upload_2020-2-10_13-59-13.png
 
Let's not start the debate on whether we should be calling F2Ps twinks to begin with... :p
There are veterans, pure f2ps, and linked f2ps. End of discussion.

If we want to get real anal about it we can put the pure f2ps that have purchased things from the Blizzard store etc in the same camp as linked rather than pure.
[doublepost=1581364866,1581364817][/doublepost]
upload_2020-2-10_14-1-1.png

He already beat you to it. Lol
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top