Since no-one needs my approval to play in this bracket I'm not voting in this poll. Concerning enjoyment; I'm personally bored when running with a 20 premade against a substantially weaker team, I'd be severely bored in a 24 10-man. I just don't enjoy extremely one-sided games, winning or losing, but losing against a 24 10-man isn't the end of the world either.
c[_];600932 said:
you cant reason with f2ps, i have tried. they want you to stick to there rules, while completely ignoring them selves. they can roll the most powerful class they can, when you do you're scum! play what you like, they do.
That's a problematic generalization. You can reason with plenty of people playing F2P or F2P restricted characters, and you cannot reason with others. Same as with any reasonably large population of humans.
c[_];600951 said:
yes you can, it costs less than 10 euros to do so, and you'd actually be contributing. then and only then, do i think your opinion matters.
i have 2 questions. why dont you pay for a game you obviously enjoy? and if f2ps want balance why are 80% of them playing the same OP classes? strait answer please, dont beat around the bush.
1. I don't need to pay for the game I enjoy, which is the unlimited free version of WoW on US servers.
Also, I don't want to pay money for a more extensive version of a game I take random breaks of some weeks to months from.
2. Here we encounter the elusive shared consciousness of F2Pdom again, that I'm explicably not a part of.
Why, your observation of variance and discrepancy between some F2Ps' words and others' actions almost suggests that F2P players are
not in fact part of a giant collective hive-mind, but that just cannot be.