Druiddroid
OG
Unobscured said:Come now. I have heard stories like this from every single battlegroup that has transferred to Nightfall. Maybe, just maybe.... there is bias involved....?
maybe, just maybe, it's true?
lol
Unobscured said:Come now. I have heard stories like this from every single battlegroup that has transferred to Nightfall. Maybe, just maybe.... there is bias involved....?
Druiddroid said:maybe, just maybe, it's true?
lol
Unobscured said:Here, I'll explain how this doesn't work..... .... ...
Never mind. You're right. Each battlegroup that has joined us has been better than the last one, and Nightfall was the worst.
Castrophy said:While we get that handfull of bad players we also get that handful of good players
Alteffour said:Not to mention NF has infinite more games than reckoning so you can either play there and pick herbs all day, or play in NF and play in wsg...tough choice I know.
yes i would agreeAlteffour said:Statistically while there might be a bit more watered down talent per WSG (due to a higher number of overall players) there will also statistically be more over all top level talent for the same reason.
This is why countrys like China and the US have very good sports programs and countrys like trinidad and tobago dont...more overall players means more possibilities to have good players.
this is true, if you're on WoW all day, however i'm personally not so it's not much of an issue for me that i can only play WSG in the evening.Not to mention NF has infinite more games than reckoning so you can either play there and pick herbs all day, or play in NF and play in wsg...tough choice I know.
And believe me ive been through all of this...Im from Cyclone, cyclone players are even better than reckoning players and even thats not worth staying in when there arent enough of them to go around.
Sockdolager said:isn't it good that two battlegroups are happy?
what's the problem? :|
Druiddroid said:probably, but of course like ari said we beat them once. that's about the best proof you'll see from this arguement on both sides though : /
Ajiito said:who is it that you beat?
Alteffour said:umm, druid, there is little logic to what you are saying.
Statistically while there might be a bit more watered down talent per WSG (due to a higher number of overall players) there will also statistically be more over all top level talent for the same reason.
This is why countrys like China and the US have very good sports programs and countrys like trinidad and tobago dont...more overall players means more possibilities to have good players.
Not to mention NF has infinite more games than reckoning so you can either play there and pick herbs all day, or play in NF and play in wsg...tough choice I know.
And believe me ive been through all of this...Im from Cyclone, cyclone players are even better than reckoning players and even thats not worth staying in when there arent enough of them to go around.
Druiddroid said:like 10 cyclone players around like 2 years ago
PHILtheTANK said:lol 10 cyclone players 2 years ago? thats a real good measure of skill...