Banned

I am setting you with a set amount of bush you need to slay per day not that you arent playing, this quota needs to be filled thot.
 
rekt lol, good luck
 
It was bound to happen eventually.
Not really sure why, but it seems like only decent players cheat; It's sad really.
Cheers anyway.
 
Kek...
They all get caught eventually. I don't get why so many people on this site cheat at this game. It really is not required.
Might be the best thing that happened to him though.

It was bound to happen eventually.
Not really sure why, but it seems like only decent players cheat; It's sad really.
Cheers anyway.

Think about that one for a second...
Maybe the only reason they were "good" was because they were cheating. This bracket has lots of "cheaters". It has for a long long time. Be it good or bad.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

"Web Stresser", "C99.nl Skype Resolver", banned for botting.

Ya, don't let the door hit your ass on the way out, douchebag cheater.

LOL!
[MENTION=10938]Broken[/MENTION] [MENTION=22365]Burg[/MENTION] [MENTION=18568]Hashbrowns[/MENTION] [MENTION=5830]Chap[/MENTION]

How is this guy not banned already? He's already shown his support for 3rd party software via jump macroes in video's he labels as "guides" on the site, now he's just shown he uses and supports ddosing services / ip resolvers which is quite illegal to begin with. Ban this mongoloid please...
 
LOL!
[MENTION=10938]Broken[/MENTION] [MENTION=22365]Burg[/MENTION] [MENTION=18568]Hashbrowns[/MENTION] [MENTION=5830]Chap[/MENTION]

How is this guy not banned already? He's already shown his support for 3rd party software via jump macroes in video's he labels as "guides" on the site, now he's just shown he uses and supports ddosing services / ip resolvers which is quite illegal to begin with. Ban this mongoloid please...

TI should not ban someone for what they do outside of TI. Unless he breaks CoC, there isn't anything a mod can do.
 
TI should not ban someone for what they do outside of TI. Unless he breaks CoC, there isn't anything a mod can do.

He's displaying sites with services that as far as I know are against the ToS via his favorites bar with this image, has made numerous videos displaying his jump macroes and has talked about 3rd party software more often than should be allowed. All on TwinkInfo.

He's not even the first person to do it and get away with it as far as I've seen, the moderation on this site is seriously lacking.
 
TI should not ban someone for what they do outside of TI. Unless he breaks CoC, there isn't anything a mod can do.

XI. Posting Prohibited Material will lead to an Infraction without a Warning. Moderators reserve the right to hand out a two-week Temporary Ban or a Permanent Ban immediately, depending on the material posted. The content will be deleted. Prohibited Material is anything that [ is / deals with / contains external links to information about ] the following:
--- Exploiting, hacking, or defrauding Blizzard/Activision or its games.
--- Cyber-attacking any website, online service, or individual.
--- Posting others personal information, such as real name, photos, and address.
--- Graphic Material, like nudity, sex stuff, drugs, alcohol, graphic violence.
--- Slander or malicious misinformation.
--- Spamming
--- Scamming: A scam is defined by TwinkInfo as any occurrence in which one party fails to abide by the original transaction terms that were agreed upon by both parties, or fulfill a refund or an alternate resolution agreed upon by both parties, within 48 hours of the agreed upon time of the original transaction. Twinkinfo reserves the right to hand out a Permanent Ban to any User participating in the carrying out of a scam, if Twinkinfo Staff can verify that a scam has happened. TwinkInfo also reserves the right to withdraw at any time from any mediation between parties in a legal dispute, and offers no legal advice nor takes any legal responsibility for transactions carried out between individuals through the site.
 
So there were already 2 huge banwaves in a year and still people bot. The point of this topic was? (because saying goodbye wasnt for sure)
 
XI. Posting Prohibited Material will lead to an Infraction without a Warning. Moderators reserve the right to hand out a two-week Temporary Ban or a Permanent Ban immediately, depending on the material posted. The content will be deleted. Prohibited Material is anything that [ is / deals with / contains external links to information about ] the following:
--- Exploiting, hacking, or defrauding Blizzard/Activision or its games.
--- Cyber-attacking any website, online service, or individual.
--- Posting others personal information, such as real name, photos, and address.
--- Graphic Material, like nudity, sex stuff, drugs, alcohol, graphic violence.
--- Slander or malicious misinformation.
--- Spamming
--- Scamming: A scam is defined by TwinkInfo as any occurrence in which one party fails to abide by the original transaction terms that were agreed upon by both parties, or fulfill a refund or an alternate resolution agreed upon by both parties, within 48 hours of the agreed upon time of the original transaction. Twinkinfo reserves the right to hand out a Permanent Ban to any User participating in the carrying out of a scam, if Twinkinfo Staff can verify that a scam has happened. TwinkInfo also reserves the right to withdraw at any time from any mediation between parties in a legal dispute, and offers no legal advice nor takes any legal responsibility for transactions carried out between individuals through the site.

Mods do not follow these. There are still jump guides and vids on this site which they do not see as exploiting enough to remove... lol

Chap said:
because of the brand new CoC and how determined you seem to rid this forum of jump related guides. In the three reports we received from you recently, we decided against moderation of the threads, because we do not deem the jumps featured exploitative enough to warrant removal. While certain jumps can be classified as exploits, they would have to be grave for us to take action, and I'd like to ask that you take this into account next time you consider reporting a thread on those grounds.

Sincerely,
Chap
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top