A Tribute to Healers
- Thread starter Trialmop
- Start date
- Status
Lil
SV huntard
Lol this is pathetic.. I know I'm not a huntard and I'm not quoting anyone but if ANYONE thinks ANY class has gotten ANYWHERE near as much whining on this forum as hunts then you don't read half the threads on here. I don't take it personally I just get irritated when I see the same thread 3 times a day a day about a class I like to play yet other OP classes get nothing. It's cute though how just because I say something people think I take it personally or I'm "butthurt".
If you MUST continue complaining about hunts and nothing else everyday ATLEAST learn a new fucking hunter joke or stfu cause it's gotten old seeing the same 3 jokes over the years my god. I KNOW I'm not the only person sick of it so if I'm the only one who will say something then get called butthurt or crying idgaf.
Edit: Ya I mad
If you MUST continue complaining about hunts and nothing else everyday ATLEAST learn a new fucking hunter joke or stfu cause it's gotten old seeing the same 3 jokes over the years my god. I KNOW I'm not the only person sick of it so if I'm the only one who will say something then get called butthurt or crying idgaf.
Edit: Ya I mad
Last edited by a moderator:
Oneshot20
Legend
If the hunter class is a joke make a ticket for Blizzard to take the class out of the game and then the next hated class is paladin.
Spiriel
Legend
Or Druid or Rogue or Priest...Depending on the own class..
U see there is no real second but there is always a great and wonderful first
Nah just bitching!
I rly don´t care as long as ppl play objectively. With or against me.
Lil
SV huntard
And how much pally complaining do you hear compared to hunt complaining..? Exactly my point..
It's a fairly easy class to play yes. That is obvious. Idk about being a joke cause at this level if you know how to play your class to it's best alot of classes can be considered a joke. However you and I both know atleast 75% of the hunts in this bracket are middle ground at best. Most classes can kill an avg hunt if they know how to play their class right. Even in 5.0 when hunts got a major nerf to dmg people were STILL complaining about our utility. In cata the complaining was nonstop and was understandable to a certain point.. You've been here longer then most people so you know that the complaining about hunters isn't even close to being matched by anyone else.
It's not even that I'm trying to defend my class like I was in cata.. I know there are alot of bad hunters out there and that people play it cause they think it will be easy however it's clear when you see a hunt who is good or who is just playing a hunt to try and faceroll. It's the fact that no matter what happens to hunts whether we get nerfed to the ground or buffed back up to near cata numbers the complaining stays. It's like hunters are just the scapegoat alot of times.
Same way people got annoyed with me after awhile and tired of seeing my name is the SAME thing that I feel about all the old hunter jokes. It got old..
The Saint
I won't like you
hunters have been know as huntards from day one, why on earth would that stop because you've been playing one since cata.
X class was OP in patch x.x.x, Y class OP in patch x.x.x. you ever stop to think that people always moan about hunters because they've always been OP at low lvl? the class is broken at these lvls, i play one and can admit it.
OP
OP
Trialmop
F2P Community Leader
I Must say in 04 hunters were not op and in 5.0-5.1 they were very bad that u barely saw 1 in a bg so technically they havent always been op.
The Saint
I won't like you
5.0-5.1 hunters was fine. there damage was put back down to earth with the rest of the bracket and the guys like you stopped playing them, that's why they wasn't many around. 3 interrupts (4 depending on race) was plenty.
OP
OP
Trialmop
F2P Community Leader
Your so inacuate lol. If you noticed i made tons of videos during 5.0 -5.1 and the dps was not fine - rogues criting 900 - hunters criting 200 if lucky -holy -pals criting 800(b4 nerf) druids criting 900 even warriors did more damage then hunter which was not fine. You probably didnt play hunter in 5.0-5.1 the way your talking lol ill disregaurd what your saying becuase your mainly just lieing. lol you think down to earth is holy paladins criting 800 and 1k lol.
Fujin0
Legend
It's exactly this 'most' that ticks me off about hunters.
I have to play to my absolute best to have a CHANCE at killing an undergeared faceroll hunter on my BiS mage or (yet to be) BiS warrior.
Which is basically the same as in cata, but with smaller numbers and a tiny bit higher skillfloor.
Example: I have 2k hp in bgs on my warrior (that was before the recent gear changes), on a cold spring evening I saw this hunter with 900/1600 hp charging BS on his mighty stallion with a group of other people. I picked him, because I thought I would have a rather easy win and a dead hunter is a good hunter to my team. After the fierce fight, there I stood looking at his corpse with 53hp left and a Serpent Sting on me, but was somehow able to defeat this hunter and got a Cleanse and heals on me shortly after.
The 3+ hunters/bg don't help. They help as much as the 3 frisbees I get thrown into my face while crossing mid the same second I get conshot spammed by 3 hunters and HoJ'd the second after.
Actually, hunters were the last class added to the game.
CripzBlood
Legend
Last edited by a moderator:
verh
Legend
Actually, you are more "inacuate". You cited three overpowered specs and a fairly balanced class, saying that because hunters did less damage then them hunters were bad. There are a couple of things wrong with this. First off, you fail to mention how hunters had just much, and potentially more depending on race, cc as all four of those classes COMBInED. Second, warriors did not do more damage then hunters, they did roughly the same. It would also be fine for warriors to out dps hunters, considering hunters are a mobile ranged cc class and warriors are the exact opposite. Third, you seem to be basing whether or not something is bad off of the top what, 10% specs? You seem to be concluding that just because hunters are not the best that they suck, which not only is so stupid that I literally can't describe it with the english language, but also leads me to believe that you only play a hunter to faceroll.
OP
OP
Trialmop
F2P Community Leader
People i notice want to convince blizz to take all hunters burst away and give us good CC. In 5.0 a hunter with 3 CCs had no chance vs a holy Paladin - those who remember 5.0 holy paldins correctly understands(u clearly dont). Now if you took the 4.3 hunters vs a 5.0 holy paladin it would be alot more even. Hunters damage was way too low in 5.0 if they had the same damage as 5.2 i would not complain - IF you are a healer that can solo a hunter your just bad. Take note also in 5.0 warriors had 2 charges and hunters could not cast while running so a warrior with 1.8k + still had a chance vs a hunter who had no dps at all really. also balance druids could heal to full a hunters damage so easy. Hunters damage in 5.1 got a little better but 5.0 was just uneceptable- worst dps specs then was fury warrior - enhance sham - hunter - a good geared ele sham could even beat a geared hunter easy becuase heals were op then and hunters damage was bad. water sheild = your mana wont run out at that time.
Chasee
Legend
im pretty sure hunters weren't nearly as bad as enhance shamans and fury warriors in 5.0
OP
OP
Trialmop
F2P Community Leader
The damage was a little better but i say enhance shams at least can heal a lil bit back then but nothing was as bad as first warriors - Afliction did more damage that patch than it does now drain soul was doing 150 a tic then. Think i have so clips of it. But yea hunters was very bad then - im not speaking about super geared hunters who damage was still bad but imagin someone who just made a hunter.
verh
Legend
Billy Madison - Ultimate Insult (Academic Decathlon)[Forum Weapon][How To Troll][Ignorance Is Bliss] - YouTube
In all seriousness none of what you just said was even relevant to what you are quoting so I'm going to assume that a) you have such poor english reading comprehension that it is not even worth arguing with or b) you are really, really high right now. Either way have fun being stupid, it's not worth my time.
OP
OP
Trialmop
F2P Community Leader
You lost the conversation so now you are insulting and raging at me.
- Status