A NEW World Order!!

Allybeboba

Allybeboba

Legend
Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Microsoft have signed the EU hate speech ban code.

Now. what I would like to know is who determines what exactly is “hate speech”. For what some consider “hate speech” may not be considered “hate speech” to all.

Welcome to the New Order!!
 
""For what some consider “hate speech” may not be considered “hate speech” to all.""

you could say this about anything. what constitutes murder varies from country to country and even state-by-state.
 
Allybeboba said:
Welcome to the New Order!!
Click to expand...
The New World Order isn't new at all. The powers that be have been ruining... oops I mean running this Planet for Centuries. Only recently (since the age of the Internet and Social Media) are more People waking up to the notion that we're only as "Free" as they allow us to be.
 
Allybeboba said:
Actually the definition of "murder" is pretty unwavering. It really would not depend on the country. Homicide may be the word you are looking for.

There is a system of double standards alive and well in the world today. What some groups are looked down upon for saying/writing/talking about/doing others are allowed do to without any issues what-so-ever. If there are going to be "rules" the rules will have to be addressed and be the same for everyone across the board. There will need to be a zero tolerance policy as well. What will be the consequences of breaking said "rules"?
Click to expand...

no, i used the term i was "looking for". homicide is a general term and murder is a subset, as is manslaughter. a simple example would be stand-your-ground laws which vary from state to state or simply don't exist in some states. in identical circumstances person A can be charged with murder while person B can be released under justifiable homicide.

your second paragraph is too non-specific to respond to.
 
Allybeboba said:
Russia has a plan.

http://www.chron.com/business/techn...ussia-imprisoned-for-social-media-7954329.php

"Anastasia Bubeyeva shows a screenshot on her computer of a picture of a toothpaste tube with the words: "Squeeze Russia out of yourself!" For sharing this picture on a social media site with his 12 friends, her husband was sentenced this month to more than two years in prison.".....

"In February 2014, when Ukraine was in the middle of a pro-European revolution, President Vladimir Putin signed a bill tightening penalties for non-violent extremist crimes such as hate speech"...

The New World Order is here!!
kek...
Click to expand...
Um, how's that related to making please and/or thanks rude for the person(s) context?
 
Allybeboba said:
Apparently you do not know the difference between murder, homicide and manslaughter.
This is exactly why is it why it is poor form to use analogies in a debate. It often leads to leading to off topic discussion. Which is why I tried to steer it back to topic with my second paragraph that you refused to "respond to". And will attempt to do so yet again...




Note the caps. It is a title. I did not call recite it as "new" as in of recent origin.
It is a conspiracy theory...
People actually believe this stuff!!
Just as people believe the Bilderburgs and the Illuminati "run" the world.
Click to expand...

You forgot the mention the Rothschild lol
 
Allybeboba said:
I must apologize if you cannot figure it out for yourself.
Sometimes wit is wasted on those that just don't/can't "get it".

Have a wonderful day!!
Click to expand...
o, I get it. but comparing a person sharing one's life experiences to "would you ^$*($# give me some more crumpets", doesn't really answer the question.

AlisterCrow said:
It's okay Allybeboba. You can move to the US. I'm sure you could get a job writing for fox news or the national enquirer
Click to expand...

doesn't ally already live in texas?
 
Allybeboba said:
Apparently you do not know the difference between murder, homicide and manslaughter.
This is exactly why is it why it is poor form to use analogies in a debate. It often leads to leading to off topic discussion. Which is why I tried to steer it back to topic with my second paragraph that you refused to "respond to". And will attempt to do so yet again...
Click to expand...

See the problem is you started off by changing the word i used, and built from there. "constitutes" means something much different from "definition".

i said
"what constitutes murder varies from country to country and even state-by-state."

which you changed to
"Actually the definition of "murder" is pretty unwavering. It really would not depend on the country."

followed by some unsolicited and incorrect advice on what word i used
"Homicide may be the word you are looking for."

followed by some more incorrect and unsubstantiated accusation
"Apparently you do not know the difference between murder, homicide and manslaughter."

followed by some debate advise
"This is exactly why is it why it is poor form to use analogies in a debate."

followed by some fingerpointing
"It often leads to leading to off topic discussion."

followed by some self-aggrandizement
"Which is why I tried to steer it back to topic with my second paragraph..."

followed by some more "creative retelling" of what i wrote
""...that you refused to "respond to"."" (what i actually said: "your second paragraph is too non-specific to respond to.")

now, the reason why it's too non-specific is that you don't support your thesis with any real content.

thesis
"There is a system of double standards alive and well in the world today."

support
""What some groups are looked down upon for saying/writing/talking about/doing others are allowed do to without any issues what-so-ever. If there are going to be "rules" the rules will have to be addressed and be the same for everyone across the board. There will need to be a zero tolerance policy as well. What will be the consequences of breaking said "rules"?""

this may as well be gibberish. who are these "some groups" and who are these "others", and what exactly are they "saying/writing/talking about/doing". then the rules need to somehow be addressed, and then some invented tolerance policy and apparently an invented punishment.
 
Moropi said:
o, I get it. but comparing a person sharing one's life experiences to "would you ^$*($# give me some more crumpets", doesn't really answer the question.



doesn't ally already live in texas?
Click to expand...
Apparently he does, which makes sense. I was born there and I wish I wasn't. Horrible place with horrible people (Austin is alright) in my opinion. I assumed he was living in EU somewhere due to the context of his post. Oh well, I should know better than to post on a thread about the new world order.

Did you all know that the commandments for a world order are written on stones in Florida? The guy who had these stones made has a brother who owns several FEMA camps that are full of disposable coffins. Illuminati confirmed. Triangles everywhere.....holy fvck
 
Notahealbot said:
See the problem is you started off by changing the word i used, and built from there. "constitutes" means something much different from "definition".

i said
"what constitutes murder varies from country to country and even state-by-state."

which you changed to
"Actually the definition of "murder" is pretty unwavering. It really would not depend on the country."

followed by some unsolicited and incorrect advice on what word i used
"Homicide may be the word you are looking for."

followed by some more incorrect and unsubstantiated accusation
"Apparently you do not know the difference between murder, homicide and manslaughter."

followed by some debate advise
"This is exactly why is it why it is poor form to use analogies in a debate."

followed by some fingerpointing
"It often leads to leading to off topic discussion."

followed by some self-aggrandizement
"Which is why I tried to steer it back to topic with my second paragraph..."

followed by some more "creative retelling" of what i wrote
""...that you refused to "respond to"."" (what i actually said: "your second paragraph is too non-specific to respond to.")

now, the reason why it's too non-specific is that you don't support your thesis with any real content.

thesis
"There is a system of double standards alive and well in the world today."

support
""What some groups are looked down upon for saying/writing/talking about/doing others are allowed do to without any issues what-so-ever. If there are going to be "rules" the rules will have to be addressed and be the same for everyone across the board. There will need to be a zero tolerance policy as well. What will be the consequences of breaking said "rules"?""

this may as well be gibberish. who are these "some groups" and who are these "others", and what exactly are they "saying/writing/talking about/doing". then the rules need to somehow be addressed, and then some invented tolerance policy and apparently an invented punishment.
Click to expand...

Yet you have not acknowledged the difference between the aforementioned off topic analogy that you brought up.

AlisterCrow said:
Did you all know that the commandments for a world order are written on stones in Florida? The guy who had these stones made has a brother who owns several FEMA camps that are full of disposable coffins. Illuminati confirmed. Triangles everywhere.....holy fvck
Click to expand...

I did not... Aren't most coffins "disposable"? That is, except the ones that are used for display purposes.

Austin has much of the liberal leanings as does much of Europe. Maybe that is why you like it so much.
Liberalism indicates a commitment to the school of thought of the political left. This includes holding ideals such as egalitarianism (resources should be shared equally), embracing social change, questioning tradition, and distrusting authority.
Liberal is pretty much the opposite of Conservative. Conservatives believe in individual responsibility, distrusting change, valuing tradition, and respecting authority.
As you can see, from the way I explained the difference between the two schools of thought. If in fact, someone was of the the liberal mind set they would in fact not like here in Texas. As we are a bunch of hardy individuals that do not like to depend on the government for "hand outs".

At any rate, we digress. The subject of the matter here is the stifling of speech on the internet. it is happening before our very eyes and the people of the EU really don't seems to care. Considering their history not too long ago, one would think they would. Hell, people in Russia are getting jail terms for tweeting things the government is not in agreement with.

Cheerio!!
 
@Allybeboba Where did you get your definition of "liberalism"? In terms of a political and social theory, it differs quite substantially from the one you gave. The philosopher credited by many with the founding of liberalism is a man named John Locke. His writings were extremely influential on the founding fathers of the US. One of the key beliefs of Locke's liberalism was that every individual had the natural right to life, liberty and property. You state that liberalism holds the ideal of egalitarianism, which is true, but that does not mean "resources should be shared equally". That would fall into the school of thought of Karl Marx. The egalitarian ideals that go hand in hand with liberalism are things such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, etc etc. Private property is a key component of liberalism, meaning that your property is your own and cannot be rightfully taken.. and then shared equally, as you claim. Maybe I misunderstood your statement or you are more familiar with another philosopher/thinker that I am overlooking.
 
Allybeboba said:
Yet you have not acknowledged the difference between the aforementioned off topic analogy that you brought up.
Click to expand...
What a poor response... I expected more of you
 
Snack said:
What a poor response... I expected more of you
Click to expand...

The sentence doesn't even, well, make sense. it's missing a comparative.

edit////
hmm, thought the quote would quote everything, what i was actually responding to is...

"Yet you have not acknowledged the difference between the aforementioned off topic analogy that you brought up."
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top