A NEW World Order!!

I did not... Aren't most coffins "disposable"? That is, except the ones that are used for display purposes.
The New World Order commandments are located in Georgia (not in Florida) apologies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones
Here's an aerial shot of a FEMA camp full of said coffins.
vantage-products-plastic-coffins.jpg

They are designed for confined spaces and are neatly stack-able.

As you can see, from the way I explained the difference between the two schools of thought. If in fact, someone was of the the liberal mind set they would in fact not like here in Texas. As we are a bunch of hardy individuals that do not like to depend on the government for "hand outs".
The "two schools of thought" are for the sheep. It is unhealthy to buy in to that segregationist garbage. I have beliefs that would be considered conservative and I have beliefs that would be considered liberal. You could ask me which mind set I identify with most and my answer would be to think for your fvcking self and stop wasting time with categorizing everything. I would also like to touch on your delusional view of the Texan population. While I agree that most Texans I know of are hardy, the majority of the population does not make enough to afford living there without the assistance of welfare......you can google that or go by your "just knowing" things if you wish. Texans are not worried about the environment, not empathetic, not well-educated, not well-tempered and uncompromising. Now, if you'll excuse me; I need to stop painting because my broad-brush is broken from the last sentence. I apologize to the Texans that are admirable and individualistic in nature.
 
Actually the definition of "murder" is pretty unwavering. It really would not depend on the country. Homicide may be the word you are looking for.

There is a system of double standards alive and well in the world today. What some groups are looked down upon for saying/writing/talking about/doing others are allowed do to without any issues what-so-ever. If there are going to be "rules" the rules will have to be addressed and be the same for everyone across the board. There will need to be a zero tolerance policy as well. What will be the consequences of breaking said "rules"?
Every murder I would commit, would be a hate-murder.
 
I generally do not quote words I looked up on the Internet. When I do I usually put it in quotation marks. My knowledge comes from just knowing it.

The reason for the “egalitarianism(resources should be shared equally)” is that I thought it may be a quick concise way to convey to our readers that did not understand that word entirely that were too lazy or that could not be “bothered” to look it up. But it seems you have forced my hand on that one little word and have drawn us off topic yet again.

The egalitarian doctrines are basically a philosophy that all people are equal in economic and social status and advocates the removal of ALL inequalities and decentralization of power(i.e. less government). In order for people to treated “equally” resources, economic or otherwise, must be shared.



Now, we will go with my original quote.

“Liberalism indicates a commitment to the school of thought of the political left. This includes holding ideals such as egalitarianism (resources should be shared equally), embracing social change, questioning tradition, and distrusting authority.”



This would be called egalitarian liberalism which is the most prominent type of liberalism in modern United States, as opposed to classical liberalism which advocates civil liberties and economic & political freedoms.

BTW, I have had quite a good time sparing with you on the auction house from time to time!! A little thing I like to call AH-PvP!!
See ya around...

Your knowledge comes from just knowing it? I'm kind of curious how that works. Were you born with the knowledge of how liberalism is defined? Any other useful tidbits of information knocking around? This weeks winning lottery numbers perhaps. All joking aside, that is ludicrous; you know it, I know it. I think it's pretty safe to say that while you might not recall where you learned about it, something and/or someone definitely shaped your notion of it.

I'm sorry to make you define/clarify a term that you used in your argument, but a discussion of liberalism in a thread about censorship and freedom of speech is far from being "drawn.. off topic yet again" as you claim. Egalitarianism has far more to do with the individual rights of citizens than it does with the redistribution of wealth. That is not to say that some form of egalitarian principles are used (in theory) by communist states, for example, but I would hardly claim Communist China as an egalitarian state. Those principles are a story spun by those with power and authority to convince the masses that such a system benefits everyone. What a sham!

I'm curious what you consider to be "the egalitarian doctrines", as it sounds as though they define the term in a different way than I have come to know it. As mentioned above, the term typically has more to do with individual rights than leveling all differences in economic status. It generally focuses on having non-discriminatory laws and equal access to public institutions for all.

It's odd that while describing the political left, liberalism and egalitarianism that you mention that school of thought wanting less government. Typically, the left is associated with more government; the right is for less government. Think of the Tea Party movement in the US.

Anyways, this is all in good fun. I'm pretty sure you view discourse the same way, even when butting heads.
 
The "two schools of thought" are for the sheep. It is unhealthy to buy in to that segregationist garbage. I have beliefs that would be considered conservative and I have beliefs that would be considered liberal. You could ask me which mind set I identify with most and my answer would be to think for your fvcking self and stop wasting time with categorizing everything. I would also like to touch on your delusional view of the Texan population. While I agree that most Texans I know of are hardy, the majority of the population does not make enough to afford living there without the assistance of welfare......you can google that or go by your "just knowing" things if you wish. Texans are not worried about the environment, not empathetic, not well-educated, not well-tempered and uncompromising. Now, if you'll excuse me; I need to stop painting because my broad-brush is broken from the last sentence. I apologize to the Texans that are admirable and individualistic in nature.

i thought this was rather well-reasoned and brings up some good points about generalizations and categories. didn't find it particularly angry, maybe vehement at points. i missed the coffin portion of this thread so nc.
 
I'm pro hate speech. And when it comes to free speech us > eu. I'm also a classical liberal because I don't wanna share my resources.
 
LMAO! Another grasshopper just finishing up his Political Science 101 and thinks he knows a thing or two. ( See we both can be smart a$$es )

My "knowledge" comes from learning, not from reading so called facts or reciting celebrity quotes off of the Internet.

I have told you my thoughts on "the egalitarian doctrines". I believe they coincided with your definition pretty closely





Please explain how that statement is "golden". If you can...



What was "funny" about it? Care to elaborate? Lets hear you opinion.
It surely seems this "grasshopper" called you out on a lot of your point, yet your only response includes no contribution to the discussion whatsoever
 
LMAO! Another grasshopper just finishing up his Political Science 101 and thinks he knows a thing or two. ( See we both can be smart a$$es )

My "knowledge" comes from learning, not from reading so called facts or reciting celebrity quotes off of the Internet.

I have told you my thoughts on "the egalitarian doctrines". I believe they coincided with your definition pretty closely





Please explain how that statement is "golden". If you can...



What was "funny" about it? Care to elaborate? Lets hear you opinion.

Very weak rebuttal, even by your standards, Ally. If you're curious, I have been out of school for quite some time and while I was there, I was certainly not the best student. However, I do enjoy learning, reading and debating.

Not sure what celebrity quote you're talking about; I would have cited it if I had used one in a post. My own reading habits typically consist of primarily books, not random stuff found on the web.

Kind of surprised feeling the need to defend myself and not my ideas. The amount of times I've seen you condemn personal attacks (which happens quite often with you) would have made me think that you wouldn't sink that low. But hey, I guess we're all wrong from time to time.

See, how hard was that? Acknowledging when you're wrong isn't the end of the world. You should try it some time.
 
What exactly did he "call me out on"?

And your contributions to the discussion are...


Cheerio!!
I'm sure you can figure that out for yourself if you read the posts above. But you're right I'm not contributing any more than you are, telle is doing a fine job though
 
I generally do not quote words I looked up on the Internet. When I do I usually put it in quotation marks. My knowledge comes from just knowing it.

Please explain how that statement is "golden". If you can...

Liberalism indicates a commitment to the school of thought of the political left.

What was "funny" about it? Care to elaborate? Lets hear you opinion.
i'm triggered by "..."

My "knowledge" comes from learning, not from reading so called facts...

I must apologize if you cannot figure it out for yourself.
Sometimes wit is wasted on those that just don't/can't "get it".

Have a wonderful day!!
 
What is incorrect in your view in this thread that this account posted?
When you're saying 'this account', is it because you're sharing the account with someone, or is it because you believe it has a will of it own, or is it to abdicate responsibility? Just curious
 
Still waiting on what you thought was incorrect in this thread.

I've already done this in numerous replies to your posts, which you have flatly ignored in your responses. Not feeling the need to reiterate because, as you stated before, you don't gain any of your knowledge from reading. I would imagine that is most likely what is hindering you from realizing that I have already stated what I "thought was incorrect in this thread". To sum it up, pretty much the majority of your posts in this thread are strewn with inaccuracies.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top