29 twinking
- Thread starter Serebro
- Start date
Tweakedirl
Grandfathered
Hunters and Warriors get more real at 29. Arcane mage is strong at 19 and remain so at 29.
OP
OP
Serebro
Veteran
thanks for tips brother, hows fury? or is it arms only?
Tweakedirl
Grandfathered
Fury
ohti
Guest
arms does just fine
all the classes are stong if you play them right and play a good spec, no matter what you pick you'll be able to pull your own
all the classes are stong if you play them right and play a good spec, no matter what you pick you'll be able to pull your own
OP
OP
Serebro
Veteran
thanks bro just i know 19s are dominated
Tweakedirl
Grandfathered
thats why you see an equal amount of arms and fury warriors
Rockastansky
Veteran
Enhancement Shaman is not playable to any effective degree, even if Jesus is playing WoW these days. The numbers+math are just not present for pvp at 29. Feral is not far behind it, its just bad. I would even say that any tank spec is better than Enhancement or Feral.
Fury is tier 1... Arms is tier 2... but, if you like Arms you might as well just play Ret Paladin, because Ret is just better and you get healing/better abilities.
Other than that, not all that bad.
ohti
Guest
enhancement is a spec
elemental and resto are just fine resto is fotm
balance and resto are both fotm. feral actually does just fine its just most of them don't know how to play it in its current state for good dmg (albeit lvl 20 feral is non-existent)
feral and enhancement are not classes
OP
OP
Serebro
Veteran
was just asking due to 19s being so highly dominated wanted to know if there are certain classes standing out
Rockastansky
Veteran
He was talking about Arms and Fury... so you can use context clues to extrapolate he was talking about what specs are viable for any class. *Shaman is viable* is telling nobody anything... and as you just did yourself you further broke it down. So not sure why you felt the need to waste a sentence there, but it was super mr. obvious what he was asking. And the data I gave him is not incorrect, so thanks?
ohti
Guest
Rockastansky
Veteran
Sure, so everybody is in agreement, all specs are either easy mode or tier 2... and then if you want to really have to play you can use Feral/any tank spec for tier 3... and if you want to cry yourself to sleep you can play Enhancement which is tier 4. Good, everybody is on the same page.
ohti
Guest
fuck off
I actually read the initial post so I was talking about what he asked originally
shaman is viable is telling you that it is a viable class
you're the one who misquoted me
Rockastansky
Veteran
I forgive you. Take to pills. Read my last post. Cool.
ohti
Guest
i've played with good enhances in BFA (one of them was a vet) they do fine they're just far n few
do they do retard fury dmg? naw ofc not
doesn't mean you shouldnt give it a chance
ohti
Guest
if you're going to play warlock destro is the popular spec among the small amount of active qing warlocks, affl is not far behind
fury warrior has the best damage out of the three specs but its pretty retard mode, I like arms for the healing debuff
demonology isn't the best but it is a blast to play, prot I haven't tried but I know 29 prot FC was fun in legion
Svinjotaur
Veteran
I'd disagree and say that all specs are at this point separate classes in wow, because the game changed so much since wotlk tha t the specs have been made into almost separate classes containi g only a small traces of spells from other specs.
[doublepost=1545903789,1545903555][/doublepost]
Id say warrior, but they really need heals as they are getting shot at a lot more than well positioned casters, so youd probably die much more if you dont havve a pocket.
And btw, rogues are even crazier at 29 as they not only get a nice defensive cd alongside a ranged stun and cp building passive, but also get aditional procs from the proc swords from bfd which proc for around 100 damage by themselves... Add ele force and satyr and its silly...
Last edited:
ohti
Guest
I go by what blizzard defines as a class I don't make my own classifications of whats a class and whats not the hell are you on about