19s Rating List

Arkant is like a 9.5-9.7 tbh. I really don't see many things he does wrong as a hunter. One of the only hunters who uses focus to predict incoming burst for his RoS. He is nowhere near ''just above average''. I'm not getting offended, I just really think the list is not accurately presenting the skill level of amazing players.

Just my take.


Again, you and I have two totally different standards for twinks. But, I'll go ahead and end it there.


-Idiote
 
Dirt nasty's list is definitely alot more accurate than Idiotes. Rating Arkant 8 is just stupid tho mate. He's spectacular and is way better than all dem other hunters. Curlex and Sneakybeaver should have a way higher ratings as well. Might make a list if I can be bothered.

I think Idiote's list is more accurate to be honest. Idiote plays at a high skill level in any bracket he's in and I respect his point of view more as a result of this. His list seems less influenced by unnecessary biases as well.
 
I think Idiote's list is more accurate to be honest. Idiote plays at a high skill level in any bracket he's in and I respect his point of view more as a result of this. His list seems less influenced by unnecessary biases as well.

other than listing himself and his guildies at 9.5's pretty much right? :D
 
other than listing himself and his guildies at 9.5's pretty much right? :D

Vianco and Stubs are my guildies? Interesting. I'll make this short and simple. Apnea is a good friend of mine and I gave him a 7.7 or something. Not that it's a bad thing, he's a competent enough twink for me to enjoy playing with, among being a chill dude. People will believe what they want to believe though.


-Idiote
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vianco and Stubs are my guildies? Interesting. I'll make this short and simple. Apnea is a good friend of mine and I gave him a 7.7 or something. Not that it's a bad thing, he's a competent enough twink for me to enjoy playing with, among being a chill dude. People will believe what they want to believe though.


-Idiote

Im not blaming you, just the other guy claimed it was more unbiased when tbh, its not.
 
Im not blaming you, just the other guy claimed it was more unbiased when tbh, its not.

I don't see it as biased, and I think my rating was fair regardless of whether Idiote and I are friends or not. If bias came into play, I'm sure he would have rated me higher but he instead chose to do so on my gameplay. I'm an decent, sometimes above average and still-learning shaman player. I'm pretty certain who the OP is in this thread and if that's the case, I'm 100% certain personal bias came into play there. None of the guys Idiote gave high ranking to are guildies as he stated, they're players that are widely regarded as being top tier in the bracket.

And Sputnick and Pump, you bros need to take your walls of text elsewhere. The shit is far from on topic and is annoying to have to scroll past.
 
I don't see it as biased, and I think my rating was fair regardless of whether Idiote and I are friends or not. If bias came into play, I'm sure he would have rated me higher but he instead chose to do so on my gameplay. I'm an decent, sometimes above average and still-learning shaman player. I'm pretty certain who the OP is in this thread and if that's the case, I'm 100% certain personal bias came into play there. None of the guys Idiote gave high ranking to are guildies as he stated, they're players that are widely regarded as being top tier in the bracket.

And Sputnick and Pump, you bros need to take your walls of text elsewhere. The shit is far from on topic and is annoying to have to scroll past.

Don't get me wrong, I rarely post on US only threads absent reason, and when I do, it's when I've been mentioned, which is the case.

I've put him in his place, I've sent my challenge, it's up for him to accept it or not.

Will not derail this thread any farther.
 
I don't see it as biased, and I think my rating was fair regardless of whether Idiote and I are friends or not. If bias came into play, I'm sure he would have rated me higher but he instead chose to do so on my gameplay. I'm an decent, sometimes above average and still-learning shaman player. I'm pretty certain who the OP is in this thread and if that's the case, I'm 100% certain personal bias came into play there. None of the guys Idiote gave high ranking to are guildies as he stated, they're players that are widely regarded as being top tier in the bracket.

And Sputnick and Pump, you bros need to take your walls of text elsewhere. The shit is far from on topic and is annoying to have to scroll past.

not biased at all? look at the Shaman ratings again
 
Im done responding to your tiny insults, and just for the record, i havent lost a single arms-resto while playing with bischu aka paname who is more than 10 times the druid you are in arenas. huge ego, no skill.


oooh :D wanna play some mirrorz??? fun fun
 
not biased at all? look at the Shaman ratings again

Sigh, what's the matter with the shaman ratings? Come on...lets hear what Cannabis has to say on the subject. Enlighten us with your wit.


-Idiote
 
Sigh, what's the matter with the shaman ratings? Come on...lets hear what Cannabis has to say on the subject. Enlighten us with your wit.


-Idiote

lol not trying to start anything just saying i think u had people a bit lower than they should of been.

Shaman:

Irriterende: 9.4
Nicozy: 9.0
Dasfizzla: 9.5
Crapnea: 8.0
Cannabis:9.0
Bam: 8.9
Shockz: 7.5
Bastitch: 7.5
Devildwarfer: 8
 
Irriterende: 9.6
Nicozy: 9.5
Dasfizzla: 9.2
Crapnea: 8.0
Cannabis:8.8
Bam: 8.9
Shockz: 8.4
Devildwarfer: 8.4
Yowzamvp: 8.9
Shamshock 8.9

(elemental) this is from what ive seen
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top