Adamsx/Hard
Veteran
So I have always believed that stacking pure spell dmg on a 19 lock was bis ; albeit, reduced scaling.
Can anyone make a good argument against going pure spell dmg?
My 19 warlock legacylink => https://legacyplayers.com/Armory/?charid=1171329
(using +7shadow dmg stein and pulsating heart for OH)
and i'm using https://classicdb.ch/?item=892 with +20shadow dmg enchant.
I have heard people say you need to go pure stam but i am skeptical. I think, with proper mechanical theory you should be going pure dmg.
This is a little game play I recorded, on how I play a 19 lock going full out shadow and fire dmg
----------- 1st video = game play -------------- 2nd video = gear and a little more game play
Can anyone make a good argument against going pure spell dmg?
My 19 warlock legacylink => https://legacyplayers.com/Armory/?charid=1171329
(using +7shadow dmg stein and pulsating heart for OH)
and i'm using https://classicdb.ch/?item=892 with +20shadow dmg enchant.
I have heard people say you need to go pure stam but i am skeptical. I think, with proper mechanical theory you should be going pure dmg.
This is a little game play I recorded, on how I play a 19 lock going full out shadow and fire dmg
----------- 1st video = game play -------------- 2nd video = gear and a little more game play