19 Druid ownage in wsg

mickyhaynes said:
you seem like a fully geared pally, and look really good too. and im almost 100% sure you would beat me in 1v1, but im in rampage. that one pally i beat while vining and running and moonlighting was pretty good, 1300 health, above the average. but thats not my point. druids are 2nd best healers, definately better than pallies in the 19 bracket. pally dps is sure better than druid dps, because druid dps is used for crowd control and just spamming stuff, not 1v1 at all. but imo druid fc is without a doubt the best if he goes in with a hunter/rogue/warrior/ basically anyone else. pallies could not solo fc as well as a druid cuz they dont really have any ways to get away from opponents.



I FC on both my druid and pally, IDK why, but I like FCing on the pally more. Druids may be "better" but I just find it easier on my pally.
 
Eliot said:
If they were specced that they still wouldn't be multi purpose because they would be fail FCers.



plus they would oom in like 2 seconds
 
Yup, w/o natural shape shifter, it wouldn't be pretty.
 
.

Druids CAN dps well! im making a moonlight mana crit stacked sp druid specced and its fun as shit. Mickey is on to something. new travel form qq is why balance will come out on top here.
 
USER you finally see the way. get 15 sp to bracers, 16 to hands, 29 to wep, not to mention all the other sp grants like spidersilk gear and the gold flecked gloves and pvp rewards and you can do pretty well.



elliot, why do you say pallies are easier fc's? just a question, ive never rolled a pally because there are way too many of them.



ramune with our int/sp gear we would be just fine with our mana and also he is an alchemist so i use mana pots pretty much every time i go into combat.
 
elliot, why do you say pallies are easier fc's? just a question, ive never rolled a pally because there are way too many of them.



Honestly I'm not sure. I have a lot more experience with pallys and I just find it more fun and easier to FC on them. Although next patch druids will be way better at FCing due to travel form being learned at level 16.



EDIT: 200th post :D
 
Eliot said:
Honestly I'm not sure. I have a lot more experience with pallys and I just find it more fun and easier to FC on them. Although next patch druids will be way better at FCing due to travel form being learned at level 16.



EDIT: 200th post :D



excellent :)
 
vapor said:
Resto druids are extremely hard to kill and after travel form in 3.2, pally FCs will be obsolete for anything high-end in the 19s.

Good FC's don't die pre-debuff. Come debuff, travel form is worthless. Not much is going to change.
 
Painaid said:
Good FC's don't die pre-debuff. Come debuff, travel form is worthless. Not much is going to change.



Are we sure that the debuff will effect your speed in travel form so that it would be at normal speed?
 
Cptheals said:
Are we sure that the debuff will effect your speed in travel form so that it would be at normal speed?



yar, it will. You will run at 100% normal speed with debuff. Hence why when debuff comes, FC's change out minor speed to +7 sta.
 
Painaid said:
yar, it will. You will run at 100% normal speed with debuff. Hence why when debuff comes, FC's change out minor speed to +7 sta.



So pally fc's won't really become obsolete in a since because they "should" be able to stay up until debuff. Although in pugs it will be pretty big considering the 20 minute timer. So they whole DRUID FC'S ARE GONNA BE AMAZING is kind of a misnomer that should be stamped out am i correct?
 
Cptheals said:
So pally fc's won't really become obsolete in a since because they "should" be able to stay up until debuff. Although in pugs it will be pretty big considering the 20 minute timer. So they whole DRUID FC'S ARE GONNA BE AMAZING is kind of a misnomer that should be stamped out am i correct?



Well, druids are still better for premades simply because they are not so vulnerable to purge/dispel. Paladins really shined in pugs because of LoH, etc and the fact most pugs don't purge/dispel as well as in premades. But travel form will dethrone them from that status. Now they're just 2nd rate across the board -- but still effective nonetheless if played right.
 
.

Not to mention travel form is only 13% of base mana, as opposed to the current 35% for bear form. Making natural shape shifter a respec Maybe.
 
User said:
Not to mention travel form is only 13% of base mana, as opposed to the current 35% for bear form. Making natural shape shifter a respec Maybe.





Ah, good point didn't know that stat tell now. That is really gonna be a big boost for druid fc's and they will now stand alone as the best fc (As if they aren't already). So pain what you gonna do with your pally in TI?
 
Mreh, I wish my pally was getting buffed :)
 
Cptheals said:
Ah, good point didn't know that stat tell now. That is really gonna be a big boost for druid fc's and they will now stand alone as the best fc (As if they aren't already). So pain what you gonna do with your pally in TI?

Ill keep self-reppin pally fc's
 
Cptheals said:
Or...maybe your plotting to destroy TI with your pally. :D

Basically. How did you figure my plan out so fast??:confused:



But in all honesty, I enjoy paladin FCing much more than druids. For that reason alone I'll keep playing on the paladin. And despite the advantage druids have, I reckon, with the proper set-up, I can outlast any guild's offense.
 
Painaid said:
yar, it will. You will run at 100% normal speed with debuff. Hence why when debuff comes, FC's change out minor speed to +7 sta.



Isn't minor speed pretty redundant if you have travel form anyway?
 
Painaid said:
Basically. How did you figure my plan out so fast??:confused:



But in all honesty, I enjoy paladin FCing much more than druids. For that reason alone I'll keep playing on the paladin. And despite the advantage druids have, I reckon, with the proper set-up, I can outlast any guild's offense.



Same here I have a druid and pally FCer pally is way more fun.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top