What is it about hunters

lokah said:
Well next patch hunters lose Melee weapons, this means no double daggers, no daggers means no xtra agility and all so no wingclip
Click to expand...



Wow MoP talent preview section still says they can equip melee weaps. Did I miss something?



But they do lose wingclip...



Bob
 
SO much hunter QQ, lol. Hunters have always been op at low lvls, maybe someday rogues will be again. I honestly can't remember a time when hunters were not OP at low lvl. Oh, and btw blizz isn't going to "fix" that because they don't care about lvl 20 pvp, lol. Personally, I'm playing hunter because I knew it would be OP. If you rolled a horde non-hunter, I can only assume it was for the challenge of going against lots of skillpatch hunters. I mean, did you really not know what you would be going up against when you made your toon? Also, all this whining about balance... come on. Whining about balance in a twink bracket? really? I mean isn't that the point of a twink bracket? or just twinks in general? "man 85 arena is too imba for me, im gonna go play the f2p bracket for balance" lolololol If you can't stand the hunters anymore, then roll one, and if that is too bandwagon for your elitist ego then either pro up or gtfo!! /closes all hunter QQ threads
 
Since hunters are OP in low lvl's. Before rogues were OP in low lvl's and it was so annoying to get one-shot from the back without time to react. And you can't see rogues. Today rogues are little OP, but hunters... Have great health, get pet, can shot so far away you don't have the time to run, have good DPS and crit thousands.
 
The one thing I don't like about hunters is they're tank talent. I understand the tree is survivablity but 15% stam is a tank talent.



Other then that come @ me hunters <3
 
Omghax said:
Sorry but gotta call BS here. The problem with hunters isn't that they do 1337 damagez, it's that they have far more on tap than most other classes,



- Scattershot

- Wingclip

- Disengage

- Concussive shot

- 40 yard range

- Pet



Too much of the good stuff early on compared to other classes.



Bob
Click to expand...



no BS, unless you are saying blind spot and still overly focusing on hunters while other classes that have the same slip thru the crack, mages are now really rocking 15-19 and are the bane for many classes and specs



- sheep

- cone of cold

- frost nova

- frost bolt

- pet nova

- blink

- 40 yard range and beyond at times

- elemental (pet)

- counter spell



i play my 19 mage as arcane, i gain a sprint after blink, lose pet. with the 2 instant attacks i can do devasting damage
 
Arknoodle said:
The one thing I don't like about hunters is they're tank talent. I understand the tree is survivablity but 15% stam is a tank talent.



Other then that come @ me hunters <3
Click to expand...



that was brought about in wotlk because on PTR's players whined about the spec being weak in PVE, so it was buffed and became the spec for awhile back then, but then mages were QQing in particular that surv hunters were doing to much DPS in raids, so they were nerfed and now rebuffed again with 4.3
 
shanker said:
no BS, unless you are saying blind spot and still overly focusing on hunters while other classes that have the same slip thru the crack, mages are now really rocking 15-19 and are the bane for many classes and specs



- sheep

- cone of cold

- frost nova

- frost bolt

- pet nova

- blink

- 40 yard range and beyond at times

- elemental (pet)

- counter spell



i play my 19 mage as arcane, i gain a sprint after blink, lose pet. with the 2 instant attacks i can do devasting damage
Click to expand...



You're right. Although you said you play arcane so take away the pet. If you're frost you lose an instant attack. Either spec, I'd like to see you 1v1 with an equally skilled/geared hunter. I know, I play a mage.
 
Hunter's BG to measure their genitalia. Never seen one play objectively. I've literally seen hunters kill flag carriers, and not return the flag because they were chasing kills, so they didn't theoretically kill the flag carrier, it was just another kill to them.



Hunters are also taboo within this community because too many people bled from their asses for far too long in the 19 and 20 bracket. Therefore the only thing worst than a person playing a hunter not objectively is a player not playing objectively as any other class because they're too busy bitching about hunters in battleground chat.



Funniest part is, I've seen people show interest in legitimately playing hunters on these forums and in game; and they get flamed by everyone. I've seen people not post on these forums anymore because of it.



So what it is about hunters, is the fact that people are ignorant, and you should do what you like. Everyone's bitching so clearly no one's doing anything right when it comes to the subject. Treat everyone like 3 year olds and you will thrive on these forums and this bracket, yet at the same time that's the problem to begin with. It's a double edged sword and if you have to make topics like this you already don't fit in.
 
Oh, thanks
<
fix'd
 
I don't understand all dis QQ hunters are weak as ****
<
(Minus tank talent)
 
I say play what you want. This is my opinion and experience of it. Hunters are/were fun to me (haven't played mine in a while). Mine was so dominant in bg's, I got bored playing him. Their was really no diversity with him. It was shooting, running, knowing when to use my spells and such, but ya. Now I play a paladin and enjoy killing Hunters. Sometimes more than one at a time haha. Why? because when im spammed with concussion shots and can still kills them without spamming exo, it feels awesome lol
 
Trialaccountx said:
SO much hunter QQ, lol. Hunters have always been op at low lvls, maybe someday rogues will be again. I honestly can't remember a time when hunters were not OP at low lvl. Oh, and btw blizz isn't going to "fix" that because they don't care about lvl 20 pvp, lol. Personally, I'm playing hunter because I knew it would be OP. If you rolled a horde non-hunter, I can only assume it was for the challenge of going against lots of skillpatch hunters. I mean, did you really not know what you would be going up against when you made your toon? Also, all this whining about balance... come on. Whining about balance in a twink bracket? really? I mean isn't that the point of a twink bracket? or just twinks in general? "man 85 arena is too imba for me, im gonna go play the f2p bracket for balance" lolololol If you can't stand the hunters anymore, then roll one, and if that is too bandwagon for your elitist ego then either pro up or gtfo!! /closes all hunter QQ threads
Click to expand...



this guy



next time you ask yourself in disgust why the world is the way it is



just remember Trialaccountx
 
I don't need honor anymore, so now I usually play more objectively but I used to farm kills only because win or lose, I got the most honor doing that. I don't think you can blame hunters for playing non objectively with that sad fact. I think blizz needs to step up the scoreboard/what gives you honor to fix problems like this. (also nerf hunters at low lvl (never happen lol))
 
Trialaccountx said:
I don't need honor anymore, so now I usually play more objectively but I used to farm kills only because win or lose, I got the most honor doing that. I don't think you can blame hunters for playing non objectively with that sad fact. I think blizz needs to step up the scoreboard/what gives you honor to fix problems like this. (also nerf hunters at low lvl (never happen lol))
Click to expand...



Actually if you can 3/0 matches in 10 min you get a better Honor per hour rate. So playing objectively can yield more honor.



Bob
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top