Twink Rankings
- Thread starter Trialkiller
- Start date
Allybeboba
Legend
Jetlife
Legend
well keep in mind, if theres 5 hpally 29s only, its because theres 6000 BMs, ferals, Spr, and other mindlessly unskilled & bordering on 1spell to win class' kits... its not about not having the #s of 29s, theres hundreds upon hundreds that que lvl 29s all different toons over the course of a weeks span in time. Just one regular week, nothing ''special'', a typical week where most of the 19s are busy playing 19s and the people who are bored of that being on their 29... ie. non 19s for the most part for each week
theres also probably under 10 frost mages too, at least way under 10 relevant ones, theres probably less than 2 relevant ones that could be listed as useful at all to begin with.... but it doesn't mean there isn't excessive #'s of other classes such as rogue that people make up for the deficit of others because they either had the twink for a long time, or quit the less OP things to play something that has no effort/skill needed in comparison.
Mage vs Rogue overall BG efficacy is a good example of that, a lot of people who played mage just went rogue because mage became too hard to succeed w/ in the current meta for the players involved, rogue does better in solo que games w/ effortless significant difference when compared to trying to do the same (solo q) as mage, warlock, anything underpowered..
just bringing this up mainly because its not like there isnt a hell of a lot of 29s,they just are bad players mostly that play the class+spec combinations that unskilled players would rightfully be drawn toward.
minimum 75% of all 29s are playing one of the following every time they que: Ret, Spriest, Feral, Rogue, Enhance, Arms
this group of specs literally is over half of the 29s, every other spec/class fits into a minority of maybe 25%(this # is probably generous, probably a worse ratio of UNIQUE class/spec'd 29 players playing classes successfully that others don't see all that often)that que things that weren't listed on the line above this one.
theres also probably under 10 frost mages too, at least way under 10 relevant ones, theres probably less than 2 relevant ones that could be listed as useful at all to begin with.... but it doesn't mean there isn't excessive #'s of other classes such as rogue that people make up for the deficit of others because they either had the twink for a long time, or quit the less OP things to play something that has no effort/skill needed in comparison.
Mage vs Rogue overall BG efficacy is a good example of that, a lot of people who played mage just went rogue because mage became too hard to succeed w/ in the current meta for the players involved, rogue does better in solo que games w/ effortless significant difference when compared to trying to do the same (solo q) as mage, warlock, anything underpowered..
just bringing this up mainly because its not like there isnt a hell of a lot of 29s,they just are bad players mostly that play the class+spec combinations that unskilled players would rightfully be drawn toward.
minimum 75% of all 29s are playing one of the following every time they que: Ret, Spriest, Feral, Rogue, Enhance, Arms
this group of specs literally is over half of the 29s, every other spec/class fits into a minority of maybe 25%(this # is probably generous, probably a worse ratio of UNIQUE class/spec'd 29 players playing classes successfully that others don't see all that often)that que things that weren't listed on the line above this one.
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
Trialkiller
Grandfathered
The general consensus at the time twinkstats was "revealed" I guess you could say, for lack of a better word, was for the min. games considered to be "official" should be 500+... I know this, I just wanted to see some opinions from the "community" on the subject. I'll give it some more time before I commit any sort of effort into a list, or encourage anyone else to commit to a list.
That being said, I think the official minimum games played SHOULD be based off whatever the total amount our savior and guiding light in these dark times, aka the "Pug Lord", has played... just a personal opinion, I see there's a couple votes so I'm not the only one who thinks this... lol don't get upset lads I'm just fucking with you. We all know less than 1% of the bracket can even compare to the Pug Lord, it's an unrealistic expectation.
Anyways... not concerned about how many people make it onto these lists, if it's so bad that there's not 5+ per class with 500+ played or 750+ played in something like warlocks we can easily lump the top 5 on the "no-lifer" list together for rankings... Just keep in mind this is a discussion thread, nothing is concrete.
This wouldn't be a 20 - 29 rankings list, maybe 21 - 29 but no vet's... If you want to potentially see your character on these lists go and update it onto www.twinkstats.com
That being said, I think the official minimum games played SHOULD be based off whatever the total amount our savior and guiding light in these dark times, aka the "Pug Lord", has played... just a personal opinion, I see there's a couple votes so I'm not the only one who thinks this... lol don't get upset lads I'm just fucking with you. We all know less than 1% of the bracket can even compare to the Pug Lord, it's an unrealistic expectation.
Anyways... not concerned about how many people make it onto these lists, if it's so bad that there's not 5+ per class with 500+ played or 750+ played in something like warlocks we can easily lump the top 5 on the "no-lifer" list together for rankings... Just keep in mind this is a discussion thread, nothing is concrete.
This wouldn't be a 20 - 29 rankings list, maybe 21 - 29 but no vet's... If you want to potentially see your character on these lists go and update it onto www.twinkstats.com
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
Trialkiller
Grandfathered
So looks like the minimum games required to be eligible for these "top twink" lists will be 750, is anyone interested in helping make some of these lists? let me know in a message or whatever.
once again here's the strawpoll that decided the requirement for games played: Straw Poll
once again here's the strawpoll that decided the requirement for games played: Straw Poll
Twinki
Legend
Twinkies @ Bleeding Hollow - Community - World of Warcraft
Well over 2,000 games played 83% win ratio 1k plusFlag Returns
Battleground Death count is 4,936 and my Killing Blow count is 42,843
Hopefully I'm still one of the GOAT priests even though I'm currently not active
29s 4L
Well over 2,000 games played 83% win ratio 1k plusFlag Returns
Battleground Death count is 4,936 and my Killing Blow count is 42,843
Hopefully I'm still one of the GOAT priests even though I'm currently not active
29s 4L
Allybeboba
Legend
BCEP - World of Wacraft Twink Ladder
Much better site if you care about arena ratings.
Alas, the characters I added were removed due to maintenance. /cry.
Much better site if you care about arena ratings.
Alas, the characters I added were removed due to maintenance. /cry.
OP
OP
Trialkiller
Grandfathered
Another useless comment... I have already mentioned that site, Ally. Go back to your corner.
Allybeboba
Legend
Last I checked this was the 20-29 section... Some subscribers play level 20's. And Trialkiller does not make the rules for the level 20-29 subscriber section.
Allybeboba
Legend
OP
OP
Trialkiller
Grandfathered
M8 arent you like 50? Guess that explains your lack of ability to stay on topic and read what is written. Get off my threads please, Ally, you dont even play 29s and I dont think anyone appreciates your trolling.
Allybeboba
Legend
What was useless about it? Did you link it in this thread?
Please tell us if you can....
I shall answer yours now in order.
No.
And yes I do play in the 29's. I am quite sure longer than you as a matter of fact if that really matters.
Not "trolling"...You cite examples of me this trolling in this thread please. If you can, I will cite examples you in return for each.
Have a wonderful day.
Ever back on topic...
BCEP - World of Wacraft Twink Ladder
Is a great site for people interested in arenas as I mentioned. Because it pulls your area stats and hidden MMR.
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
Trialkiller
Grandfathered
Why are you so obsessed with de-railing threads? I have already asked you multiple times through messages privately to stop stirring shit up on my threads, I can already tell any point I would try to make would go right over your head seeing the complete lack of context you pick up in any given post.
Get off my threads you greasy old peasant.
Jamesb
The OG Jamesb
I liked ur site more, Ally.
OP
OP
Trialkiller
Grandfathered
This is the 29 section, if you can read it says Level 29 Twinking... not 20 - 29, they changed that a while back after controversy over the difference between vets / f2ps and 29s. This is also a discussion thread about a potential list of rankings for 29s, not for vets and f2ps and etc...
Like I previously said the characters that are ON twinkstats... I have been asking people all throughout this thread, and even in the original twinkstats thread, to upload their characters if they want to be included. Since this makes it 100% easier to track.
What was the point of this comment anyways? You just want things to go your way.
I think its pretty obvious which sites I was talking about, if you had half a brain to use you would use context to realize what I meant instead of making useless posts.
Jamesb
The OG Jamesb
Leave Ally alone nerd
Allybeboba
Legend
The sad thing is I put the thread back on topic and it is YOU that perpetually derails it. On top of that you continue to personally attack me...
Ever back on topic....
Why isn't 500 games enough on one character? Or 250? Even 250 seems like it is enough.
Your straw poll suggests that you trying are pull the most amount of people as possible just to put yourself in the limelight.
Me, I could careless about limelight. I don't even link my characters.
If we surely want people with PvP experience, then total account HKs should be considered. Or even players with certain achievements. Be they ratings or battleground or whatever.
One would think we would want as many people on the list, not very little. One would think it would be awesome to be in the top 10 of a 100 as opposed to the top 5 of 15.
Instead, we have people wanting to constrict this "list" to meet their needs. To ensure they "rise" to the top. Or at least they appear to rise.
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
Trialkiller
Grandfathered
Youre a hypocrite, m8.
Go read over the thread again, look at the straw poll and come back to me, then get off my god damn thread you peasant.