Twink cup thoughts/idea and Myrm legendary status?

[Donteventrii]

this bracket has been as active as it is currently in the recent past before there was even any mention of a second tournament

half the people who even queue 19s right now have no interest of even participating and play purely because they enjoy 19s over anything else

Thank you for the reply. Did you mean right before the xpac when end-game is dead? I remember a lul after the xpac that continued until the TC started to formulate.

Do you have an opinion on having a tournament guaranteed during this current iteration of the bracket?

Tapatalked from a PACMAN 4.4 Note II

 

[Skeezin]

Thank you for the reply. Did you mean right before the xpac when end-game is dead? I remember a lul after the xpac that continued until the TC started to formulate.

Do you have an opinion on having a tournament guaranteed during this current iteration of the bracket?

Tapatalked from a PACMAN 4.4 Note II

the sole reason there was no 19s up until now in the xpac was because of the queue bug which was only just fixed recently after people took to twitter. you could argue that new content may have had something to do with it but it didnt take long for everyone to figure out how dogshit warlords of draenor is

im personally not a fan of there being more than one tournament per year as i think it drives people away from playing their bracket who are unable to participate for whatever reason

 

[Donteventrii]

im personally not a fan of there being more than one tournament per year as i think it drives people away from playing their bracket who are unable to participate for whatever reason

Could you elaborate on this a little more? Conventional thought would lend itself towards more tournaments = increasing any given groups ability to participate in at least one in case that specific date range doesn't work.


Tapatalked from a PACMAN 4.4 Note II

 

[Honey Badger]

My beef is with the aforementioned Honey jerkjob, making threads he has no business in making. I sincerely apologize if I have offended you in any way.

1) i do play 19s just not under Honeybadger since 3.0.2 & currently

2) i brought a positive idea to sustain interest all year long for the Bracket since you have a huge money pool. ( Why not spread it out)

3) I'm giving praise to Myrm


No reason to be Salty with me

 

[Skeezin]

Could you elaborate on this a little more? Conventional thought would lend itself towards more tournaments = increasing any given groups ability to participate in at least one in case that specific date range doesn't work.


Tapatalked from a PACMAN 4.4 Note II

because usually only the best of the best are picked so people are always going to be left out, granted they are still able to try and form their own teams with the other bench warmers

frequent tournaments would lead to more inactive periods for pugs, not everyone in 19s wants to wargame all the time so this would prevent people from doing that

1) i do play 19s just not under Honeybadger since 3.0.2 & currently

reveal yourself scum

 

[Donteventrii]

frequent tournaments would lead to more inactive periods for pugs, not everyone in 19s wants to wargame all the time so this would prevent people from doing that

I can see that. Thanks for your input.



Tapatalked from a PACMAN 4.4 Note II

 

[Kilda]

I really think it should be reserved for Sneaky......

I agree plenty of credit should go to Myrm for organising the tourney, the efforts which Myrm is making are for the whole community, in-game, on the official forums, and here on TI.

The reason to give Sneaky his own rank was one mutually agreed upon by the staff, and supported by virtually every member on the forum. If you read the thread about his passing it's actually incredible how many peoples hearts Sneaky reached. I don't know a single person even in real life who had as many 'friends' as Sneaky. Truly one of a kind.. For that reason I think it should be unique to him.

 

[Pizza]

Whether Myrm receives legendary status on TI or not, he'll always be a legend in the bracket.

 

[Allybeboba]

In reference to posts #1 and 24.
I too do not always play under the same moniker, although I do almost always play a shaman and most certainly play a heal. As my ego is not as fragile as you whippersnappers, I do not have the need to be recognized on sight.
As far as the TC being held every quarter, that would practically be a part time job.
Sneaky's title deserves to be his and his alone, for now( hopefully).

/cheers
Sweetsidney

 

[Axione]

I think Myrm deserves the legendary status 100% because he is the most humble person i have ever met... if he finds out that you need something (without you asking) he will go out of his way to get it for you. He always gives without expecting anything in return he never talks trash to anyone in the bracket he is the perfect example of how everyone in this bracket should be. He has been playing 19s since God knows how long and he is by far the best paladin the bracket. I don't know why he shouldn't get this title

 

[Aintabanka]

Pizza hit the nail on the head really.

Myrm does deserve the title, but whether he gets it or not doesn't actually matter because he will always be the legend and most valuable person in this community. Shouts out to Myrm.

 

[Conq]

Totally understandable, [MENTION=1552]Kilda[/MENTION] Just give [MENTION=18399]Myrm[/MENTION] MVP status, He deserves it more than anyone.