Dorigon
Alpha and Omega
Have you ever considered that your impression may have to do with working in a largely female sector?
Thought police
- Thread starter AlisterCrow
- Start date
Selaya
Guest
freedom is slavery ok
Nutbreaker
Legend
You are joking right?
- Men have been doing nothing but complain? wat
I quickly googled gender ratio in medical students
In 2013, 83,472 individuals were enrolled in medical schools across the United States, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges. About 38,950 were women, or 46.7 percent. That's close to half, but not quite. And the percentage of women in med school actually dropped over the past decade.
Maybe the men you know are entitled to everything and don't work for any of it, but I wouldn't assume that every male is like this because of that. All my male friends commute 1-2hrs daily and are out of the house for 10 hours Monday to Friday and would be fired if they "don't work for any of it" as you say.
Also your last point about men hiding and gaming behind screens is the most retarded shit I've heard.
Bestworld
MBA
Why are you even trying. I literally just looked past his comment. One of the very few where I was just like "ok, this def. isn't worth lol".
Nutbreaker
Legend
I just felt I had to reply to that
Sponsor
Achievement Hunting
How about that complaining? Lol
If you ever start to question masculine authority, you get a massive reaction. Love it.
My point was missed @Nutbreaker . This was taken too literally.
And there is a large difference between admission to med school and being in residency.
@Dorigon totally true. Which is why I never stated that this was actual hard evidence, but rather anecdotal. Just sharing my thoughts like everyone else.
If you ever start to question masculine authority, you get a massive reaction. Love it.
My point was missed @Nutbreaker . This was taken too literally.
And there is a large difference between admission to med school and being in residency.
@Dorigon totally true. Which is why I never stated that this was actual hard evidence, but rather anecdotal. Just sharing my thoughts like everyone else.
Nutbreaker
Legend
How was I meant to take it? What was your point? You can't just say those things without explaining, because it wasn't clear. As you can see from the responses you are getting
@Sponsor still waiting for reply on this
Last edited:
Ohai
OG
Last edited:
Walrusbreath
Grandfathered
I've seen stats and charts lately that shows Google blocking or putting results from searches to left-leaning websites several pages below the first page of results, which means those sites will be far less likely to be clicked than if they were at the top of searches as previously. They've apparently changed some algorithms so those sites are pushed down in the results.
Being as how most people never go beyond the first page before they click to a link, it is a huge issue.
There are better search engines than Google like DuckDuckGo and others that give more honest results. Fuck Google.
@Bestworld - spoken like a true neo-fascist. GG!
Nutbreaker
Legend
You've seen stats and charts have you
Walrusbreath
Grandfathered
"New data compiled by the World Socialist Web Site, with the assistance of other Internet-based news outlets and search technology experts, proves that a massive loss of readership observed by socialist, anti-war and progressive web sites over the past three months has been caused by a cumulative 45 percent decrease in traffic from Google searches.
The drop followed the implementation of changes in Google’s search evaluation protocols. In a statement issued on April 25, Ben Gomes, the company’s vice president for engineering, stated that Google’s update of its search engine would block access to “offensive” sites, while working to surface more “authoritative content.”
The World Socialist Web Site has obtained statistical data from SEMrush estimating the decline of traffic generated by Google searches for 13 sites with substantial readerships. The results are as follows:
* wsws.org fell by 67 percent
* alternet.org fell by 63 percent
* globalresearch.ca fell by 62 percent
* consortiumnews.com fell by 47 percent
* socialistworker.org fell by 47 percent
* mediamatters.org fell by 42 percent
* commondreams.org fell by 37 percent
* internationalviewpoint.org fell by 36 percent
* democracynow.org fell by 36 percent
* wikileaks.org fell by 30 percent
* truth-out.org fell by 25 percent
* counterpunch.org fell by 21 percent
* theintercept.com fell by 19 percent
Of the 13 web sites on the list, the World Socialist Web Site has been the most heavily affected. Its traffic from Google searches has fallen by two thirds.
The new statistics demonstrate that the WSWS is a central target of Google’s censorship campaign. In the twelve months preceding the implementation of the new Google protocols, the WSWS had experienced a substantial increase in readership. A significant component of this increase was the product of Google search results. The rapid rise in search traffic reflected the well-documented growth in popular interest in socialist politics during 2016. The rate of growth accelerated following the November election, which led to large protests against the election of Trump.
Search traffic to the WSWS peaked in April 2017, precisely at the point when Google began the implementation of its censorship protocols. ..."
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/08/02/pers-a02.html
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/08/08/goog-a08.html
So there you have it - proof that censorship is happening. It's not a conspiracy "theory", it is a real conspiracy. There's a difference boys & girls.
The drop followed the implementation of changes in Google’s search evaluation protocols. In a statement issued on April 25, Ben Gomes, the company’s vice president for engineering, stated that Google’s update of its search engine would block access to “offensive” sites, while working to surface more “authoritative content.”
The World Socialist Web Site has obtained statistical data from SEMrush estimating the decline of traffic generated by Google searches for 13 sites with substantial readerships. The results are as follows:
* wsws.org fell by 67 percent
* alternet.org fell by 63 percent
* globalresearch.ca fell by 62 percent
* consortiumnews.com fell by 47 percent
* socialistworker.org fell by 47 percent
* mediamatters.org fell by 42 percent
* commondreams.org fell by 37 percent
* internationalviewpoint.org fell by 36 percent
* democracynow.org fell by 36 percent
* wikileaks.org fell by 30 percent
* truth-out.org fell by 25 percent
* counterpunch.org fell by 21 percent
* theintercept.com fell by 19 percent
Of the 13 web sites on the list, the World Socialist Web Site has been the most heavily affected. Its traffic from Google searches has fallen by two thirds.
The new statistics demonstrate that the WSWS is a central target of Google’s censorship campaign. In the twelve months preceding the implementation of the new Google protocols, the WSWS had experienced a substantial increase in readership. A significant component of this increase was the product of Google search results. The rapid rise in search traffic reflected the well-documented growth in popular interest in socialist politics during 2016. The rate of growth accelerated following the November election, which led to large protests against the election of Trump.
Search traffic to the WSWS peaked in April 2017, precisely at the point when Google began the implementation of its censorship protocols. ..."
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/08/02/pers-a02.html
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/08/08/goog-a08.html
So there you have it - proof that censorship is happening. It's not a conspiracy "theory", it is a real conspiracy. There's a difference boys & girls.
MYT
Legend
Lol at quoting a socialist site as an authority.
If there were a drop if anything it would be a return to letting page views / the market drive results rather than a desire to promote left wing sites. But I doubt google has changed anything. Everything socialist parties say is a lie used to get dummies to vote for their own slavery.
If there were a drop if anything it would be a return to letting page views / the market drive results rather than a desire to promote left wing sites. But I doubt google has changed anything. Everything socialist parties say is a lie used to get dummies to vote for their own slavery.
Walrusbreath
Grandfathered
Apparently you haven't been taught comprehension or reading skills. Why did you waste your time at whatever "school" you went to?
As shown above, Google's VP of Engineering admitted it: "In a statement issued on April 25, Ben Gomes, the company’s vice president for engineering, stated that Google’s update of its search engine would block access to “offensive” sites, while working to surface more “authoritative content.”
Not to mention the data was discovered by independent search technology experts such as SEMrush as cited in the article, and other affected websites had done their own investigations.
OFC you might have known that had you read the links I gave before you posted such stupidity.
Keep drinking the Kool-Aid.
As shown above, Google's VP of Engineering admitted it: "In a statement issued on April 25, Ben Gomes, the company’s vice president for engineering, stated that Google’s update of its search engine would block access to “offensive” sites, while working to surface more “authoritative content.”
Not to mention the data was discovered by independent search technology experts such as SEMrush as cited in the article, and other affected websites had done their own investigations.
OFC you might have known that had you read the links I gave before you posted such stupidity.
Keep drinking the Kool-Aid.
Walrusbreath
Grandfathered
Go back to the kindergarten playground where the kids all yell, "nah nah nah...I can't hear you" and plug their ears.
You don't "know better' than the pablum that's been spoon fed to you by school and the MSM since you were born.
It won't change the fact that there is censorship by Google now of anything opposing right-wing viewpoints. One of their VP's openly admitted it.
You don't "know better' than the pablum that's been spoon fed to you by school and the MSM since you were born.
It won't change the fact that there is censorship by Google now of anything opposing right-wing viewpoints. One of their VP's openly admitted it.
MYT
Legend
Even in the unlikely event that the socialists, in their bid to establish power, quoted accurately - the quote you cited didn't say that. If anything that policy would be used by google, an openly left wing company, to censor conservative sites.
I don't believe a thing the MSM says and never have. And while I do have an education, I can think critically. Someday if you develop that ability you'll understand why you shouldn't rely on socialist sites - or any site by people that want to control your life for that matter.
I don't believe a thing the MSM says and never have. And while I do have an education, I can think critically. Someday if you develop that ability you'll understand why you shouldn't rely on socialist sites - or any site by people that want to control your life for that matter.
Walrusbreath
Grandfathered
Evidence is right in front of you, yet you claim you "think critically". kek
Google has no right to decide unilaterally what sites are "offensive" or "more authoritative", and if it were an "openly left wing company", none of those sites above would be censored by Google - which BTW they only recently started doing since last April.
Good luck slaving and sucking cock for the corporations.
Google has no right to decide unilaterally what sites are "offensive" or "more authoritative", and if it were an "openly left wing company", none of those sites above would be censored by Google - which BTW they only recently started doing since last April.
Good luck slaving and sucking cock for the corporations.
Bestworld
MBA
How am I a neo-fascist? I literally said idgaf if you're white, black, yellow or a pink unicorn. Guess I should have included Walrus as well. My bad.