stop playing

[ROWBEARSUS]

your hunters.

 

[shanker]

hunters aren't the only ones gamebreaking in this bracket too many are too fast to blame one class. hunter vs my h-pal can't kill her, but sure can wrack up a ton of fake undone over and over damage. players like pizza, beau crutching on pocket healers and high level buffs, dragon slayer bonus are not a good example of what is occuring in a bg

speaking of damage.....too many noobs focus just on the damage numbers and QQ, further speaking of damage it is LOL funny shit to see a warlock complaining about a hunters damage. seen drayner, sidni, bloish, and many other locks top the charts over 4-5 hunters....no QQ there.

do more BGs where you end up against 4 disco's, 2 h-pals, 2 hunters, 2 warlocks/mages

my disco one BG did 19000 damage and 25000+ healing....that does not count all the damage negated which i get no credit for, but does count for those plugging arrow, dots, and melee. imo priests/hpals are the steathiest OP slip under the QQ radar. a hunter does 50000 damage and the crowd goes mad

i have been so impressed by locks recently,,,,,,btw...warlock inwork at level-16 now should be ready for MOP

 

[Dagamela]

Shank, obv priest pallies and even rogues are op right now, but they are 3 essential classes towards a fun, competitive wsg, hunters are just simply put, op skill less facerollers. Honestly games that have no hunters would be more fun regardless of how anyone argues it

 

[Galliwix]

hunters aren't the only ones gamebreaking in this bracket too many are too fast to blame one class. hunter vs my h-pal can't kill her, but sure can wrack up a ton of fake undone over and over damage. players like pizza, beau crutching on pocket healers and high level buffs, dragon slayer bonus are not a good example of what is occuring in a bg

speaking of damage.....too many noobs focus just on the damage numbers and QQ, further speaking of damage it is LOL funny shit to see a warlock complaining about a hunters damage. seen drayner, sidni, bloish, and many other locks top the charts over 4-5 hunters....no QQ there.

do more BGs where you end up against 4 disco's, 2 h-pals, 2 hunters, 2 warlocks/mages

my disco one BG did 19000 damage and 25000+ healing....that does not count all the damage negated which i get no credit for, but does count for those plugging arrow, dots, and melee. imo priests/hpals are the steathiest OP slip under the QQ radar. a hunter does 50000 damage and the crowd goes mad

i have been so impressed by locks recently,,,,,,btw...warlock inwork at level-16 now should be ready for MOP

i was contemplating 16 lock tbh i have a spare pair of mindthrusts

 

[ROWBEARSUS]

i was contemplating 16 lock tbh i have a spare pair of mindthrusts

chardev 9

it sounds fun, until a hunter comes along.

 

[shanker]

i'm not making a 16 twink lock, my lock is currently at 16 with XP off to get some satchel cloaks/belts (already has 2 AGMs)

as for rogues being OP, i disagree on that one. mages, hunters, h-pals, and well played priests punk them with ease

rogues are currently best they been since van-wow before the dodge nerfs. MOP does not look good for them losing abilities from van-wow while other classes have abilities that where as high as level49++ talents.

hunters came into power in 2007, and have been getting better every xpac. in MOP they are losing weapon stats/enchants, the 15% stam boost from surv tree. gun/bow buffs do not make up for the weapon loss, and scopes still show +2....but they gain 2 killer talent choices, DE w/sprint, or DE w/netting which is similiar to a mages nova then blink move

i haven't seen much complaining concerning this, i foresee a benching of rogues like in WOTLK.