Rogue OH

You don't need maths to know what is best for you if you had played this game for (four years).
 
Beastly said:
Anyone who does as much theoretical math as trespasser and iaccidentlysuckeddink most likely suck at playing. Its crazy how often people ask for their input and how often they give different responses for being such mathematical geniuses.



They are no more intelligent then you or myself. Stop building them up to be :)



I can do maths without taking into account most variables too! Holy shit I must be like the Rainman of this warcraft stuff.



the_cat_is_pushing_a_watermelon_out_of_a_lake.thumbnail.jpg


take it.
 
Beastly said:
Anyone who does as much theoretical math as trespasser and iaccidentlysuckeddink

ur cool

most likely suck at playing.
Yes.

Its crazy how often people ask for their input and how often they give different responses for being such mathematical geniuses.
You don't have to be good at math to be good at the game, and vice versa. Hence why my input on math matters.
They are no more intelligent then you or myself. Stop building them up to be :)



I can do maths without taking into account most variables too! Holy shit I must be like the Rainman of this warcraft stuff.



I do take into account most variables. I'm obviously not going to develop a definite formula for every swing because that would take too long and would require calculation of all the "white noise" in the area, which is unpredictable.
 
Beastly said:
Anyone who does as much theoretical math as trespasser and iaccidentlysuckeddink most likely suck at playing. Its crazy how often people ask for their input and how often they give different responses for being such mathematical geniuses.



They are no more intelligent then you or myself. Stop building them up to be :)



I can do maths without taking into account most variables too! Holy shit I must be like the Rainman of this warcraft stuff.



Maths and how you play in game is not relevant to each other at all. No matter how good they are at playing their maths are still correct.
 
Beastly said:
Anyone who does as much theoretical math as trespasser and iaccidentlysuckeddink most likely suck at playing. Its crazy how often people ask for their input and how often they give different responses for being such mathematical geniuses.



They are no more intelligent then you or myself. Stop building them up to be :)



I can do maths without taking into account most variables too! Holy shit I must be like the Rainman of this warcraft stuff.



Wait, arn't you still on Bloodlust, oh yeah, that makes u a dumbass, not a genius. =)
 
Beastly said:
Anyone who does as much theoretical math as trespasser and iaccidentlysuckeddink most likely suck at playing. Its crazy how often people ask for their input and how often they give different responses for being such mathematical geniuses.



They are no more intelligent then you or myself. Stop building them up to be :)



I can do maths without taking into account most variables too! Holy shit I must be like the Rainman of this warcraft stuff.



You're hilarious!
 
Beastly said:
Anyone who does as much theoretical math as trespasser and iaccidentlysuckeddink most likely suck at playing. Its crazy how often people ask for their input and how often they give different responses for being such mathematical geniuses.



They are no more intelligent then you or myself. Stop building them up to be :)



I can do maths without taking into account most variables too! Holy shit I must be like the Rainman of this warcraft stuff.



Pot Kettle black scrub
 
IS BWTB only better than CB because of the proc? I don't want to depend on such a low proc for it to be "better"
 
Beastly said:
Anyone who does as much theoretical math as trespasser and iaccidentlysuckeddink most likely suck at playing. Its crazy how often people ask for their input and how often they give different responses for being such mathematical geniuses.



They are no more intelligent then you or myself. Stop building them up to be :)



I can do maths without taking into account most variables too! Holy shit I must be like the Rainman of this warcraft stuff.

Don't repeat your parents' mistake, use birth control.
 
Trespasser said:
Lets see here in order with and without sharpening stones in your offhand:



[With shaperening stones]

1st: Shadowfang

2nd: Battleworn Thrash Blade (only +2 sharpening stone) assuming a shadowfang as mainhand

3rd: Assassin's Blade

4th: Cruel barb

5th: Wingblade

6th: Thief's Blade

7th: Balanced Heartseeker (only +2 sharpening stone)

8th: Skeletal Club

9th: Gutterblade

10th: Tail Spike



[Without shaperening stones]

1st: Shadowfang

2nd: Battleworn Thrash Blade assuming a shadowfang as mainhand

3rd: Cruel Barb

4th: Balanced Heartseeker

5th: Assassin's Blade

6th: Wingblade

7th: Venerable Mass of McGowan

8th: Skeletal Club

9th: Gutterblade

10th: Thief's Blade



Edit: added the part about BWTB assuming shadowfang



those all opinions?
 
i have a BTWB and i don't like it. the proc is 3% not 5% and looking at my mcgowan (4stam 3agi 2crit 4AP @19) it is not the best option imo. well, i like slow weapons...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top