Rbg help

Camael said:
Personally i think 2 x mage is better than 3 x rogue, as mages are in fact dotated of more survability than rogues, rbg wise i would say.

Personal suggestion tough.



thats true. but wouldn't rogues be more helpful going after enemy FC ect?
 
wobbrocker said:
thats true. but wouldn't rogues be more helpful going after enemy FC ect?





I belive a frost - arcane mage free casting wile one - two rogues keep the fc cced is better than 3 rogues ccing and 2 mage sheeping - damaging.
 
any dps class that can bring cc to the table and has tazik is viable in the right hands but here's a thought...



offensive heals

rsham/disc



deffensive heals

rsham/hpal



Blood DK fc



deeps:

Rogue x2

Mage x2

warlock (can't go wrong with infernal drop and a soul stone for fc or his main healer, viable utility and more unpredictable than 3 mages imo)
 
Voidrunner said:
warlock (can't go wrong with infernal drop and a soul stone for fc or his main healer, viable utility and more unpredictable than 3 mages imo)



You actually got a point there, and a warlock in the right hands is a great source of cc in fact.
 
Light said:
some strategies, tips, the comp you prefer
10 mages with tazik.
 
Shatahl said:
we went with 3 mages 3 rogues 3 disc priest and 1 holy pala for FC and it went smooth





You picked pretty much every top class in the bracket and took 3 of each, there was no way anything could go wrong to be totally honest >_<
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top