Premades... Mid Field or Offense vs Defense

[Hunnybuns]

With many guilds ready/getting ready to be at the premade level again as we hop into MOP, wanted to see everyones opinion on whether they favor Mid Field or Offense vs Defense! Personally I think they will both be their own challenge! Having tried a pick up game 10v10 in the first days of MOP, it is EXTREMELY cc oriented, will be fun to see how many teams use the new class/moves/abilities to their advantage! Looking forward to trying both when premades get rolling in MOP! State your opinions!!! -HB

 

[Sneaky]

O n D all the way! With healers being so OP, it would be near impossible to get kills on EFC's in mid. WIth a setup Offense and Defense, it's a different story.

 

[Hunnybuns]

O n D all the way! With healers being so OP, it would be near impossible to get kills on EFC's in mid. WIth a setup Offense and Defense, it's a different story.

Also with O and D another aspect that will be alot of fun is seeing the variety of comps guilds run! Don't see one set in stone comp being the best as it was in cata, there are quite a handful of useful utility classes that will be a challenge to counter!

 

[Xda]

O n D for sure!

 

[soskanky]

You'll probably be most successful employing a hybrid of both TBH.

 

[Karmaz]

You'll probably be most successful employing a hybrid of both TBH.

play the situation

 

[soskanky]

play the situation

Live in the moment

 

[Kitn]

Yolo

 

[Karmaz]

Yolo

no.

 

[lokah]

WT lost because of mid, if they stuck to the plan that they used against USA, MGC and btb it could've been in their favor.

 

[Kitn]

WT lost because of mid, if they stuck to the plan that they used against USA, MGC and btb it could've been in their favor.

actually, no. WT lost because they have never went up against another guilds full A team in cata. they were trying to do the exact same thing to us as they did to usa, mgc, and btb, but we could do it better then they themselves could.

 

[Cannabis12]

actually, no. WT lost because they have never went up against another guilds full A team in cata. they were trying to do the exact same thing to us as they did to usa, mgc, and btb, but we could do it better then they themselves could.

to be fair to MGC we had 2 mages both frost and a Hpally FC and we still capped



MGC #1

 

[Kitn]

to be fair to MGC we had 2 mages both frost and a Hpally FC and we still capped



MGC #1

mathe was arcane

MGC #1
TC's God

 

[Mocha]

WT lost.

Fixed

 

[Claspara]

Fight mid.. I enjoy to see people pissed off

 

[Drugs]

Bump for this thread... the poll results are rather astounding. This poll should be considered!

 

[Stavie]

I enjoy middle games with a lot of action, but they never end up with a takedown of the FC's.
Having two teams talking together, O and D is really fun aswell and better so fosho O versus D.

 

[Eliot]

If one team chooses to play O and D and the other tries to play in mid it would nullify the mid strat. I think O and D is a more fun way to play and way more effective.

 

[Arkant]

If one team chooses to play O and D and the other tries to play in mid it would nullify the mid strat. I think O and D is a more fun way to play and way more effective.

Actually if one team chooses to group as 10 it nullifies the O and D strat since the other team would be forced to group up aswell.

 

[Dorigon]

If one team chooses to play O and D and the other tries to play in mid it would nullify the mid strat. I think O and D is a more fun way to play and way more effective.

How does having O and D nullify the mid strat? All it does it create a 10v5 advantage in the area of combat.