Not saying you can outlive a feral, saying you cant outlive 4 warriors.
#elretardo
You do realize that avoiding warriors as an FC is completely doable as an FC, especially with a BM monk or hunter; whereas ferals cannot be slowed or kited around, I guess that logic doesn't make sense to you.
u couldve just told us in the first place that u dont play this bracket lmao
^^^^^^^^
do u even play this game? warriors have charge to connect, thats it. ferals can stealth up, have a stun, have a charge, run fast, can shift cc and do more burst than warriors.
as lost as it gets
I'm aware you can kite warriors, however you both seem to be assuming other factors, I never mentioned there being other classes near, BM monks or hunters. I'm also not saying the FC isn't a prot Pala/Warr. No one is arguing that if you were going to choose 4 players to kill an FC you'd want 4 ferals, but tell me how a prot warrior alone is going to survive 4 warriors.
I'm a bit confused then, what setting other than a PuG game would you be referring to? all i see is a druid against 4 warrs and it would be stupid to assume he would have no defense.
again. ur question was "what fc can live 4 warriors", the answer is every druid as i told u like 10 posts ago. can u pls stop trying to make it look like paladin or warrior fcs r a common thing to avoid looking like a complete retard
which is wrong because a druid fc can and also happens to be the most common fc class
edit: ur literally trying to make up random scenarios in which ur previous statements arent completely retarded.
Hey just level'd a feral, planing on returning tons of flags. was wondering when the que times are for US?
I'm not making up random scenarios, you just seem to be placing my situation into your perfect FC world, in which every single time the FC is a druid and that he has a strong close defense, sure that's ideal, but that won't happen all the time.
nah hes just like that
i wonder how these games wouldve ended with 4 ferals
note that 1 doesnt even have a druid fc.