Druiddroid
OG
Naturaltalnt said:Heh I never understood why people said theres 3-5 hunters per game, sure I get that rare game with 3-5 hunters, but my avg pug has 1...2 max, and usually its on each side so it balances out.
2 max eh. check your next 5 games.
i don't play 29s much anymore but what i remember was hunter infested games 1/2 the time.
29/39 I would say both have good balance, although I havent played it recentlly, back when I did play 39s it was a mass amount of rogue/hunters and acouple warriors. Unless something changed majorly between BC and LK hunters were never "underpowered" in the 39s, I ran a disc priest, warrior, ret paly, holy paly, 2 hunter, rogue combo. we destoryed.
nowadays it depends on which side has more twinks will have the HK advantage, not the side that has the right classes. and a lot of games in reckoning are like 3 good twinks vs 3 good twinks or something, and it's really even in most games.
any class can do well. apparently much stuff has changed since when you played 39s because both casters and physical dps are pretty equal.
granted, rogues can be a bit overwhelming, but they have to use their CDs properly and 95% of them don't. so it's a non-issue.
hunters are, while a more powerful class at 39, nowhere near what power they have at 19/29/49. plus, you have to be smart, not just twink at 29, turn on cheetah, and chase people with 2.5k health and keyboard turning while easily catching up. at 39 most stupid hunters won't feign death or viper sting so it's easy. smart hunters will still provide a challenge by using those abilities.
you said people that think 29s aren't balanced don't play there. i was proving a point. you forced me to use hksYou started with the Hks, not like I was trying to brag.
sure this started by me calling some one out, 29 is no where near one of the worst balanced brackets and you know it.
39 is more balanced. i'm not saying 29s are incredibly imbalanced.