Merging all Battlegroups into One.

[Rayu]

Why, if they could, wouldn't they have merged all battlegroups into one when they merged servers? It's not that it's technically impossible, it's just not really a big problem. It would probably cost too much money to help a really small group of players. Look at games like Halo 3 and MW2 where you can play against others all over the globe.

 

[Taitaih]

Halo 3 and MW2.... don't have dedicated servers. Unless you want someone hosting on their computer... not gonna happen.

 

[McBankington]

Halo 3 and MW2.... don't have dedicated servers. Unless you want someone hosting on their computer... not gonna happen.

It... happens all the.... time... derp

 

[splenda1]

Halo 3 and MW2.... don't have dedicated servers. Unless you want someone hosting on their computer... not gonna happen.

two fails games, so w/e

 

[Taitaih]

It... happens all the.... time... derp

........ derp........... yea it does.............. but ............. blizzard would never do that.

 

[McBankington]

........ derp........... yea it does.............. but ............. blizzard would never do that.

Contradicting yourself.

 

[Taitaih]

Meant private servers. Since, you know Blizzard makes us host our own WSGs when we want to play them right?

 

[McBankington]

If everyone leaves the BG will stay up with the timer being hosted by the server.

 

[Taitaih]

Sarcasm missed .



But my point being way back when, Halo and MW2 are locally hosted, retail WoW will always be dedicated. It's true that you can play with people around the world with Halo and MW2, but that matchmaking still attempts to put you with people close to your area to reduce latency.

 

[Falkor]

computer used to have dedicated servers b4 companies figured they could offload the work on to us and save mon3y!!!!!