i highly considered it could be EUs given the info I had (but was never 100% sure) until i asked stubs for some more information. After hearing what stubs had to say i considered several other possible culprits. My mind was never made up 100%, as there was never enough conclusive evidence. Angel is making false, baseless accusations about me and i have every right to defend myself. You are in no position to accuse me of what i was 100% sure of...
[15:37:52] ----: "i highly considered it could be eus until i asked stubs for some information. Stubs will tell you there were numerous other people i accused. You are in no position accuse me of what i was 100% sure of."
[15:37:56] ----: stubs tell me
[15:38:02] Stubs: well
[15:38:07] Stubs: he said it was an eu
[15:38:09] Stubs: 100% first
[15:38:13] Stubs: because the guy said so
[15:38:20] Stubs: and he was also 100% sure it was hurrx
[15:38:23] ---: Tell me about the numerous other suspects
[15:38:28] ---: that werent eu
[15:38:29] Stubs: cus the guy said he was eu and hacked livingforce bank
[15:38:38] Stubs: there was non
[15:38:40] Stubs: until i said
[15:38:42] Stubs: i think it was barb
[15:38:48] ---: damn, he's lying to me
[15:38:51] Stubs: then he asked barb
[15:38:55] Stubs: and barb said it wasnt him
[15:39:00] ---: pls quote him in the thread and tell him what he actually said
[15:39:02] Stubs: and then drugs said "Its not barb, he said its not him"
[15:39:07] Stubs: lol