Nohealsforju
Legend
Stop rolling them.
Stop playing them.
Kthxsbai.
Stop playing them.
Kthxsbai.
Hunters
- Thread starter Nohealsforju
- Start date
OP
OP
Nohealsforju
Legend
Jdoring said:
i play a rogue. also i have a mage it is hard to play him when i get blasted by 3-5 hunters every single game.
Jdoring
Legend
what a coincidence i play a mage too... and yes.. just dueled a hunter that was 20 f2p, he might have shot me with 3 arrows but i was in his face the entire time and he still killed me... sooo basically he meleed me and still beat me in a duel... but hey.. dont hate the players hate the game right?
C O T U S
Legend
Nohealsforju said:
i've played against you before. you're a terrible rogue who rolled a 24 to try and feel good about himself by beating up on f2p 20s. i've humiliated you multiple times 1v1 on my level 20 mage. you are in absolutely no position to complain about people rolling hunters. please stop.
iaccidentallytwink
Guild Master
Nohealsforju said:
>he doesn't deny his 24 rogue
go away
OP
OP
Nohealsforju
Legend
SO you guys ignore the hunter problem good for you guys. I guess you want this bracket to be eaten by hunters i moved to this bracket because of the hunter problem in the 19 bracket.
Cotus you act like i am suppose to be offended i die in BGs some times. You die too in BGs doesn't mean i am bad just means some one caught me when my Cds where down.
Also, do not ignore the evident hunter problem every single side has 2-4 hunters per game having any less imo is just luck and it is a gift. I played in game with no hunters on each side it was more enjoyable there were often long fights but it was much better w/o hunters.
Cotus you act like i am suppose to be offended i die in BGs some times. You die too in BGs doesn't mean i am bad just means some one caught me when my Cds where down.
Also, do not ignore the evident hunter problem every single side has 2-4 hunters per game having any less imo is just luck and it is a gift. I played in game with no hunters on each side it was more enjoyable there were often long fights but it was much better w/o hunters.
iaccidentallytwink
Guild Master
Nohealsforju said:
Hunters are not as huge of a problem as they are made out to be. They are squishy. My hunter is often killed quickly in BGs unless it is a 1v1, and then I only die to good players. They have high damage output but they also have high damage input. Casters shouldn't have a problem with them. Geared 24s are a much bigger problem when they are good. Good 24s are worse than good hunters.
iaccidentallytwink
Guild Master
okay. I was assuming because before having my interrupt Paladin's destroyed me. My bad.Vaught said:
Stealthypie
Legend
You must not play RBGs a lot. 3-5 people focusing one target should be "same old same old" if you ever play in RBGs. You must depend on you healers and DPS to peal, cc, and heal you so you don't die. Now if you were to say, "QQQ My team is too bad to heal and cc," you'd be wrong. It is probably because you are lvl 24. Seeing a lvl 24 tells me you are terrible and would rather try and roll people instead of haveing a fair fight. I wouldn't and never have healed a 24 due to that fact.
Try a lvl 20 f2p twink and maybe you'll see a difference.
Try a lvl 20 f2p twink and maybe you'll see a difference.
OP
OP
Nohealsforju
Legend
Stealthypie said:
no i have a 20 hunter (HUNTER) i do not intend on playing him any time soon. i made in a post before if i wanted to roll people i would play my main i do that in every BG i play. I do not GY farm on any of my 24s. If i pass thru Gy it is because i am FCing or i am trying to catch up to the EFC, FC.
And i often find my self carrying the team i often am the only one to get thru MF. (due to so many hunters they often kill all my team mates)The Only person who can kill the EFC. It gets frustrating that it is not that it is me versus 4 people but me versus 1 then 2 more join in as i am running away one comes in and gets KB. Seriously you can't assume stuff just because some one rolls a 24.
If you roll a huntard i can assume you have no skill what-so-ever are an unwanted child and play an OP class because you just want to be OP.
Of course in the word assume is "ass u me". So please stop assuming.
C O T U S
Legend
iaccidentallytwink said:
i suggest getting a spider pet with net. honestly, a paladin should never even be able to touch a hunter at level 20. literally....they shouldn't ever get close enough to you to hit you with their melee weapon.
the only thing you should ever be worried about is HoJ, and that's what the spider pet is for. when he goes in for the HoJ, net him out of melee range. in a bracket like this, you should keep your pet at your side to guard against possible ambushes instead of sending it out to attack whatever target you're on. nobody is ever going to escape you with 6 second duration concussive shot on a 5 second cooldown with 0 focus cost (lol?). no need for the pet to go out after them - he's your defensive ace in the hole.
i'm probably going to regret posting this here, but spider pets are ****ing retardedly broken in this bracket. you can guard against pallies with no bof. you can net rogues so they can't shadowstep. it's just absolutely ridiculous.
ps: make a mouseover net macro, it's a lifesaver. also a mouseover scattershot macro. have fun going 50-0
OP
OP
Nohealsforju
Legend
thurghul said:
Ya it takes skill to press 2 buttons(Explosive shot, serpent sting) and run around in circles and back pedal and as a hunter. imo Rogues take more skill and better use of CDs than a hunter it is just run shoot concussive shot(scatter shot), explosive shot (or aimed shot if you are MM). Seriously i do not even play a hunter and i know what to do when a play when.
Idk how many times i have to say it but i do not farm on my 24 i do not grief obviously new players. Hunters do that all the time and nothing is said about them because they play level 20. And they aren't bad for rolling an OP class. Rogues aren't OP since they rely on ambush and i did roll muti for a little bit got annoying since i could not get to bad hunters most of the time but when i did get on one they got all poisoned up and destroyed.
Starup
Legend
Nohealsforju said:
First of all I wont agree with this hunter stuff till someone tells me where the term huntard comes from. Cuz tbh hunters are hard to master as a class. I play them. Their definite counter are priests, rlly good warlocks, and nearly any melee class that can get close which only excludes warriors. I have faced good rogues in RBG's and had honest duels with them. He won some. I won some, and yes even with the opener. Dont blame the fact that most of those players you fight are bad. Find a good hunter. Remeber why teh word huntard was made.
Medan
OG
Nohealsforju said:
lol
Nohealsforju said:
This is actually a problem. The match can be balanced and then some random scrub 24 twinked rogue oneshotts our FC and instant returning the flag.
You have both a 24 and a hunter. And you complain about hunters.
Also, to the other poster:
Hunters at low level have the lowest skill cap. They are so easy to play and overpowered that blizzard even wrote on the class creation screen that it is a good starting class
shanker
OG
Nohealsforju said:
hunters are over QQ'd on it 19....tonite we destroyed a alliance 5 hunter heavy team in 19's. they had 3 hunters that were all top damage 64-76K.....yeah 76000 on one, wish i did a SS. we won game 2-0 due to two holy paladins and one priest.
many just look at the damage and begin the QQ. yet healers absorb it away, heal thru it, reheal over and over causing hunters pecking on them to post what appears to be insane damage numbers.
also tonite, i have been noticing arcane mages just destroying big time, many are out doing hunters on the charts. they can kite down rogues and melee imo faster than hunters do.