Put 10 hunters and 10 warlocks in a VS fite, and the hunters will win.
But when u have them being support by other classes, warlocks will win. They dont oom, and hunters will never be able to compete in the DMG charts in long-term fights when the other team has just as many heals as you.
Okay thanks for the responses. Like I said, I have an 18 druid on Draenor hordeside, that I can use for BGs, I could completely reroll on Aierie Peak too. But right now I am making a Enhance Shammy Alliance side of AP, I am also thinking about making a Priest for the Horde on AP. But right now I want to test the water on my Shammy. If Horde is really losing as much as you say, I will work on my healer.
play what you want and have fun more than anything
If more people took the time to learn a class they found fun and interesting, and also took the time to get the basics of pvp down then this bracket would be more fun.
Sadly people lack the basic understanding of PVP and when they decide to roll a class they like, naturally, they get roflstomped, then go with the old "**** it this class is OP I'll play that and be gud"
Why did you use +2 weapon damage on your weapon when weapon damage has no bearing on feral damage, only weapon DPS? +3 INT would be the superior choice, no?
Why did you use +2 weapon damage on your weapon when weapon damage has no bearing on feral damage, only weapon DPS? +3 INT would be the superior choice, no?
i thought they changed it so it did? not sure, it's been a while
This
It only affects whites, and considering feral heals are a joke already the 3 int wont make much of a diff.
I've got some honor lying around maybe ill get another dredger and test out the +3 int