lindenkron
OG
Grunge said:
Blizzard should just give every ability at level 1. Or wait, just make everyone instant lvl 85 with every ability and every gear piece in-game
(You guyz see ware dis is goin?)
GG Blizzard, Hunters needed a buff, not!
- Thread starter Pizza
- Start date
- Status
Blizzard should just give every ability at level 1. Or wait, just make everyone instant lvl 85 with every ability and every gear piece in-game
(You guyz see ware dis is goin?)
Grunge
OG
lindenkron said:Blizzard should just give every ability at level 1. Or wait, just make everyone instant lvl 85 with every ability and every gear piece in-game
lindy, im saying if they feel hunters should disengage then it would make sense for warriors to have gap-closing abilities, and generally make other classes more mobile at lower levels. What you said isn't going to happen and sounds kind of like a troll post.
Detroit
Legend
Missboom said:
Act?
I stopped playing my 19 rogue because spamming ambush simply isn't fun to me, so if tards get disengage maybe my hunter will become stale to play as they are already uber OP and melee classes cause zero problems without disengage.
I want twinking to be fun, not just a stroll in the park requiring no skill whatsoever
shanker
OG
goblin hunters rocket jump = disengage.........but on a longer CD
worgen hunters with a sprint even at 40% will be hard to deal with too
hunters only really shine now if your group has the better heals/paladin combo crew along with rogues/druids helping you stay alive. speaking of paladins, trying to kill one with your hunter..lol, same as target testing on a 60 dummy, except overtime hunter dies.
worgen hunters with a sprint even at 40% will be hard to deal with too
hunters only really shine now if your group has the better heals/paladin combo crew along with rogues/druids helping you stay alive. speaking of paladins, trying to kill one with your hunter..lol, same as target testing on a 60 dummy, except overtime hunter dies.
Nohealsforju
Legend
Well you can disengage quick turn around(180 degrees) then rocket jump further away.
examinerEU
Legend
amen brother
Twerk
OG
Disengage was my very favorite thing on my 29 hunter a long time ago. Nothing more fun that wing clip > disengage > aim shot> pew pew > conc shot > pewpew DEDLOL.
Also, disengage off of lumber mill + parachute cloak to BS was fun as hell
I do agree though, Disengage in 19s seems a bit much unless other classes (especially warriors) get some lovin'.
Also, disengage off of lumber mill + parachute cloak to BS was fun as hell
I do agree though, Disengage in 19s seems a bit much unless other classes (especially warriors) get some lovin'.
fochixi
Legend
As person who mostly plays warriors, this news made me throw up a little in my mouth. Just another sign that I should avoid the 10-19 bracket if I plan on playing a warrior. I hope this change doesn't make it to live.
They could give warriors get Intercept and Hamstring somewhere between levels 10-19..........and move Warbringer to at least the 2nd tier, preferably the 1st tier, of the Protection Tree. That would help balance things out again.
They could give warriors get Intercept and Hamstring somewhere between levels 10-19..........and move Warbringer to at least the 2nd tier, preferably the 1st tier, of the Protection Tree. That would help balance things out again.
fochixi
Legend
Yes. And the problem with that is...................?
It was more of a comment about how ridiculous I think adding disengage at 14 is. Especially considering that hunters have enough snares/stuns already. If they balance this by bringing more utility to other classes then I'm cool with it, but, just pumping up one class is the kind of stuff that ruins brackets.
It was more of a comment about how ridiculous I think adding disengage at 14 is. Especially considering that hunters have enough snares/stuns already. If they balance this by bringing more utility to other classes then I'm cool with it, but, just pumping up one class is the kind of stuff that ruins brackets.
- Status