Fun/Underrated Arenas Combos

[DubbsBegins]

Even in the situations you describe ShS is better then combat, and that's not 1.5 secs in an opener lol.

common sense buddy... didnt think i really had to say this in step by step.
the combat rogue wont kick the healer right away...
maybe in 2 - 3 seconds.
and after the kick the healer has to cast for 2 - 3 seconds (more likely 3 seconds when 3 melees are hitting the healer)
and then there is gouge.
happy?

ridiculous.

i just dont understand why people cant admit combat is not bad at all. what did combat rogues do to you lol? just because no one plays (Naridon is combat btw) it doesnt mean its shitty. I dont want to hear comments like "if you are a rogue, you need to have utility and burst etc shit" i know. I did not say combat is completely better than sub.
still way better than warrior.....
yet people call players who gimp themselves to be a pro like warrior but calling combat rogue noobs because they gimp themselves... by that logic, everyone other than lvl 24 hunter is all noobs.

 

[youakim]

Common sense? The silence is not better because:
1. There is nothing else a healer should have to trinket against that comp
2. It's the same length as the global cooldown, and the rogue has no way to get on target if he gets peeled.
Also, in your strategy you listed meld as something so I'm going to assume this would be triple nelf. The second ambush from a sub rogue would give more burst. Double sub is hands down better for that comp, I don't even know how you can be so dense.

 

[DubbsBegins]

Common sense? The silence is not better because:
1. There is nothing else a healer should have to trinket against that comp
2. It's the same length as the global cooldown, and the rogue has no way to get on target if he gets peeled.
Also, in your strategy you listed meld as something so I'm going to assume this would be triple nelf. The second ambush from a sub rogue would give more burst. Double sub is hands down better for that comp, I don't even know how you can be so dense.

well true nothing you said was wrong. however, trinketing improved kick cannot possibly be faster than faked kick
and of course 2 sub and feral is better why do you think its underrated?
my point is combat rogues shouldnt be where they are at

i never said this comp is the best comp in the f2p bracket... why are you acting like i did

PS technically, 3 sub is better.

 

[Jdoring]

Priest fears all 3 and your team drops the feral first.


I think that's game?

Oh wait it's an hpal lol bop.


Edit: 3 sub rogues is no bueno. Too squishy and any kind of peels its GG

 

[C O T U S]

try mage/lock sometime. particularly if you're playing with AGMs - this combination can be extremely nasty at low levels in the hands of good players. we went more or less undefeated on bg9 with this combo at 19. it was hilarious to have the noobs log on level 1 alts and rage at us when we would keep one of them CC'd for 40 seconds straight.

ah, the good old days of Skirmish arena queues....

 

[youakim]

I was thinking bdruid/lock/disc or rsham would be fun, spamming dots on everything.

 

[kablam]

Just found out balance/Firemage/healer is called spicy chicken cleave so now i really wanna play that

 

[Jdoring]

I'll have me some spicy chicken in mop

 

[Umpteenth]

imo
hpaly/hunter vs mage/balance druid.

 

[Snowjobs]

3 lazer chickens all in lunar state = poor poor other team

 

[Swoops]

3 lazer chickens all in lunar state = poor poor other team

When I saw you had the last post in this thread, I was totally expecting it to be something along the lines of "3 DRUIDS ON BWL, ANY SPEC". Only half disappointed

 

[Vianco]

hpriest, enha shaman, sub rogue

 

[kablam]

hpriest, enha shaman, sub rogue

Unstoppable

How do you think enhance feral would work in 2s?