Firey Vs Crusader
- Thread starter Goma
- Start date
iaccidentallytwink
Guild Master
Casinex said:
16 is terrible.
Also stop trolling.
Druiddroid
OG
Goma said:
not if you're a hunter
Evocate
OG
Question..I understand crusader procs but I mean, I dont generally try to let something that procs crus hit me while it is procced. Like.. if a rogue procs crus while I am dueling one on my mage (this has never happened to me) I would probably just throw CD's down or even sheep and restart the duel to avoid the inc burst. Same with most classes..
Basically I would think that fiery would be better in game simply because its a proc that affects every hit whereas crusader is very time specific. If it procs its nice and all but if they are kiting you, you might not get the full extend of the damage. Arent all the numbers everyone is quoting based on 100% hit rate to the back? What happens when in an arena the other person is trying not to get hit..
Basically I would think that fiery would be better in game simply because its a proc that affects every hit whereas crusader is very time specific. If it procs its nice and all but if they are kiting you, you might not get the full extend of the damage. Arent all the numbers everyone is quoting based on 100% hit rate to the back? What happens when in an arena the other person is trying not to get hit..
Twinkytoes
OG
Firey is better for a rogue.
Drayner
Guest
Goma said:
Pot meet Kettle?
iaccidentallytwink
Guild Master
err why did the last few posts get mixed up?
Yndigo
Guest
fiery > crusader for rogue imo.