Dramatized
Legend
I wouldn't call them competative
Few questions, help much appreciated
- Thread starter Vapriest
- Start date
- Status
I wouldn't call them competative
The Saint
I won't like you
Arkant
Freedom~
Actually for you every game should be competitive since you make up even for the biggest garbage on the opposing team.
People like you just start crying as soon as the other team consists of top tier classes instead of accepting the challenge. Most of the class compositions on horde side are easily able to beat 4 hunter 4 healer french teams as long as people focus on the game and their own performance instead of the classes the french roll with. Maybe you are just getting steamrolled by them because either you or your team (or both) aren't good enough.
The Saint
I won't like you
i play horde to, and horde get raped by the french class stacking that's why ppl hate them.
now i'll say this once and once only wow "skill" isn't my top prio, but if you wish some 1v1 let me know, i'm sure a "pro" like your self should have np's beating me.
i see why you like the OP class combos though, when was the last time you queued on your resto druid??
now stop talking bollocks. my 4 year old could win a game running premade stacking hunters and healers.
now unless you wonna 1v1 fuck off son
Nakedplumber
Tink
1v1 doesnt win wsg tho
Arkant
Freedom~
It is almost hilarious how little sence your posts make. I'll just answer sentence by sentence since there doesn't seem to be any connection between them:
I know that you play horde aswell, and it is completely irrelevant. Horde gets "raped" by french teams mostly because a) they focus on crying from minute 1 and b) they simple aren't good enough players. Queueing with 4 hunters + 4 healers doesn't mean you steamroll every WSG if you face half-decent opponents.
I honestly don't understand why you keep stating that your WSG skill isn't your top priority. You only need a small amount of game knowledge to be not terrible on a priest or a hunter. I actually beat your hunter 1v1 about an hour ago, and it wasn't a problem, as you said.
I can't roll with "OP class combos" simply because I soloqueue 95% of the time. I don't play my resto druid because I don't enjoy FC'ing and therefore roll with a healer more useful for offensive, defensive and mid healing. I played quite a lot combat rogue lately though which people don't seem to count to the OP specs.
I gladly accept that challenge. That statement alone proves how little you know about this bracket.
As I said, you already got 1v1'd.
Junoo
<XL>
No, just no.
Arkant
Freedom~
Obviously for you competitive means with max 2 hunters and 2 healers or something like that and both teams ignoring mid control.
Junoo
<XL>
Arkant
Freedom~
You and Sainttwink should start a guild together, then we finally got a place to gather all those retards running around in this bracket.oh my bad, i disagreed with you. i guess you wont stop till i do(
It is a fact that the majority of Aggramar and Aszune thinks that people should only fight inside the two bases and not further than 50 yards from either flag.
Junoo
<XL>
dafuq did i just read?
The Saint
I won't like you
my hunter as done two games today, and didnt do a 1v1 in any of them, bullshit is bullshit.
queuing with 4hunters and 4healers is a massive advantage vs pugs, fact.
oh lol your winlog? we did 1v1 and you exospammed me
but i killed you in my pet stun 3 times that wsg, now i see why you're pissed, oh and pally isn't OP? :Oalso you are actually the worst paladin i've come across. im a bm hunter, kill/hoj the pet moron. if you like facing 4+hunters fine, i and most of the bracket dont. thats one thing i know about the bracket. been as you're such a hunter slayer i'm an awful hunter yet i have np killing you, go figure
Ondura
Legend
I'd like to know where you got your consensus from.
The Saint
I won't like you
and your guild would be full of healers and hunters, for that extra competitiveness. playing your way is why people aint queuing, my real id is full of people on there mains or just inactive. i'm glad you enjoy playing the french, soon they'll be all thats left.
edit: so all you want is one big mid fight or gy camp? sounds fun, i can do that at 85 so no thanks. but i dont agree with you so ofc i'm wrong, sorry i'll go now.
arcunt will answer any of your questions guys, he speaks for us all.
Last edited by a moderator:
Arkant
Freedom~
You decided to chase my paladin through the ally base until I decided to turn around and kill you. I consider this as a 1v1.my hunter as done two games today, and didnt do a 1v1 in any of them, bullshit is bullshit.
queuing with 4hunters and 4healers is a massive advantage vs pugs, fact.
oh lol your winlog? we did 1v1 and you exospammed me
also you are actually the worst paladin i've come across. im a bm hunter, kill/hoj the pet moron. if you like facing 4+hunters fine, i and most of the bracket dont. thats one thing i know about the bracket. been as you're such a hunter slayer i'm an awful hunter yet i have np killing you, go figure
No doubt it is. But it is no free win.
What do you expect me to do when you randomly chase me around, reliably missing every scatter by around .5 seconds. I am honestly not pissed when I get stunned at 80% and 3-4 people kill me since there is nothing I could do about it.
Why on earth would I HoJ your pet when you are terrible enough to let me just turn around and HoJ + Exo you to death? That single statement proves again how horrible you are.
I don't "like" facing 4 hunter but I dont have a problem with it either as long as I have a half decent team.
What gave you the impression that you have no problems killing me? In the only 1v1 situation we ever had you ended up losing horribly.
Why does a person crying about mass hunters all the time play a hunter himself anyways?
Last edited by a moderator:
Hurrx
the true profit
but arkant is actually quite correct on most parts
judging by the few games i had yesterday and comparing them to the games ive played vs the french, french has to be more competitive opponents
i mean i was against 5 draenor hordes and we won easily 3-0, was like histeria nazhifajtm anarchism sely and some hunter from draenor, another hunter, another good geared rogue and 2 badgeared ones vs a similiar team on alliance. they are supposed to be some of the best players in this bracket according to a lot of ppl and still they cant give any competition
oh and i thought id add - histeria and anarchism afkd after 2 flagcaps :I
judging by the few games i had yesterday and comparing them to the games ive played vs the french, french has to be more competitive opponents
i mean i was against 5 draenor hordes and we won easily 3-0, was like histeria nazhifajtm anarchism sely and some hunter from draenor, another hunter, another good geared rogue and 2 badgeared ones vs a similiar team on alliance. they are supposed to be some of the best players in this bracket according to a lot of ppl and still they cant give any competition
oh and i thought id add - histeria and anarchism afkd after 2 flagcaps :I
Last edited by a moderator:
Dramatized
Legend
yeah ofc that's correct
but the problem is that the french queues 8+ people that's also on vent with eachother (iirc) - often atleast 3 healers (often paladins) and 3 hunters. For a game like that to be competative it would require the opposing team to atleast get 5+ that's BiS geared players and knows how to play. From my experience you're awfully lucky if half your team is filled with decent geared- and skilled people, it's certainly nothing that occurs every BG.
But if french faces a horde team consisting of people that knows what to do it is most likely going to be a competative one or even 3-0 to horde lol
The Saint
I won't like you
i killed you 3 times in mid solo, you must of been in a different game to me, and i wasn't chasing you i was leaving fr and you was heading to the roof and my fc was there. i play a hunter because 1: i want to 2: i play 5 hunters in different brackets including 85 and always have done, 3: someone told me it was a "competitive" class.
- Status