Favorite F2P Class

[Nutz.]

Whats your favorite class to play on F2P.



> Not the most OP, your favorite <

 

[Jeralulz]

But I have several! -.- Warlock, Warrior and Paladin (not 'cuz of Paladins are OP more 'cuz they are able to do like every role)

 

[Nutz.]

Same, trying to decide which one is my favorite. lol

 

[Atychiphobia]

Why do even someone vote on Hunters? They are too OP in this bracket and get so boring after awhile. It also means you are afraid trying new classes and getting owned.

 

[Gametime743]

First char was a warrior, iv been playing since the middle of TBC and i cant get enough of the class thats why i have a tottal of 11 spread around 2 accnts

 

[barthilastwink]

Why do even someone vote on Hunters? They are too OP in this bracket and get so boring after awhile. It also means you are afraid trying new classes and getting owned.

free country

Also there are quite a number of 24s so some people might have rerolled hunters out of frustration/making the ground fairer

 

[Atychiphobia]

free country

Also there are quite a number of 24s so some people might have rerolled hunters out of frustration/making the ground fairer

Getting owned and then making a hunter isn't an arguement or a excuse ^^

 

[augiddin]

Why do even someone vote on Hunters? They are too OP in this bracket and get so boring after awhile. It also means you are afraid trying new classes and getting owned.

Resto shaman calling hunters op. LOL

 

[Tinkerton]

Except for Hunter which I find mind-crushingly boring in WoW (either keep the Pets OR the damage OR the kiting, all three because of Arena is just sheer bad game design in my book), I like playing all my toons.



I also hate playing all my toons a lot of times, as the good moments - bad moments ratio in WoW is to me certainly not worth paying for.

 

[Atychiphobia]

Resto shaman calling hunters op. LOL

I haven't said that resto shams aren't OP. They maybe are against some classes but a proper hunter against a proper skilled shaman the hunter should win.

It's a matter of opinion. the question is whats your favorite class? You feel they get boring after awhile, alot of people obviously dont agree. That does not make they are afraid of trying a new class and getting "owned" thats just retarded logic because you dont know how many different classes they have played and what THEY enjoy the most. Maybe they get raped all day long as hunter and plays naked, that has nothing 2 do with the point since they could still enjoy it. This is not "what class is most balanced/unbalanced ?"

Yeah I see your point, but I thought people only did play hunters to own it up when they can't play.



It's maybe good that they're honest.

 

[Shockur]

TBH, if hunters werent so OP they would be pretty fun to play. Like if you reduce their damage by 60% lol. Or remove some of their tools. I've always enjoyed pet-based classes for the added micro challenge (obviously not a challenge when rolling OP hunter). Like when I rolled a demo lock a while ago I was loving the fact that I had pretty much a mini-warrior in my control (charge, throwdown, bladestorm NOMNOMNOM)



That aside, my vote goes for shaman, I just love the class, all specs. Really wish we had instant GW in the bracket.

 

[Mrcer]

Where's the boomkin option?



;_;

 

[shanker]

Why do even someone vote on Hunters? They are too OP in this bracket and get so boring after awhile. It also means you are afraid trying new classes and getting owned.

not gonna dig for the post....for some reason i remember you refering or admitting to yourself/res-shams as being OP in the bracket



anyway no hunter is going to 1 vs 1 a res-sham, they will never have to focus to finish one off. infact it can take 3-4 players (which includes hunters) to kill a good/geared F2P 20 res-sham and........you know this



as a feral druid (only F2P 20 i have) can't take one down solo, 9 stacks of earth shield get you thru till long cast full heal healing surge goes thru. then a shock for me, free attacks from totem.....end up having to run away or die



priests, paladins, and res shamans pointing finger at hunters as being OP is LOL

 

[augiddin]

Yea an equally skilled resto shaman is not Gunna die to a hunter unless they get some wicked rng 1v1. Feel free to consult bone on the matter.





Also on a side note hunters have by far the highest skill cap in the bracket the only problem is the skill requirement to kill certain classes is just stupid. Before you try to argue this with me just look at how many abilities they have.

 

[Atychiphobia]

Yea an equally skilled resto shaman is not Gunna die to a hunter unless they get some wicked rng 1v1. Feel free to consult bone on the matter.





Also on a side note hunters have by far the highest skill cap in the bracket the only problem is the skill requirement to kill certain classes is just stupid. Before you try to argue this with me just look at how many abilities they have.

I have to agree that skill cap is kinda high compared to other players if you wanna strafe right yeah.



But a duel against a hunter with moth pet is pretty much rng. Bone however have stacked full stam set and he is like an anti hunter shaman, if he get silenced with full hp you wont manage to take him down. However against some classes he will get oom very fast and die.

not gonna dig for the post....for some reason i remember you refering or admitting to yourself/res-shams as being OP in the bracket.

I haven't said that they aren't OP, I'm just stating that hunters do need a pointing finger cause they are OP in mostly all of the low level brackets. Everyone that's playing F2P have played P2P aswell sometime so they should know that the class hunter is very OP at this bracket. Shamans however aren't OP at 19 for example, which I played pretty much aswell. It's just the healing surge and water shield/earth shield that makes big difference, a 19 shaman only have one thing of that.

 

[augiddin]

I have to agree that skill cap is kinda high compared to other players if you wanna strafe right yeah.



But a duel against a hunter with moth pet is pretty much rng. Bone however have stacked full stam set and he is like an anti hunter shaman, if he get silenced with full hp you wont manage to take him down. However against some classes he will get oom very fast and die.







I haven't said that they aren't OP, I'm just stating that hunters do need a pointing finger cause they are OP in mostly all of the low level brackets. Everyone that's playing F2P have played P2P aswell sometime so they should know that the class hunter is very OP at this bracket. Shamans however aren't OP at 19 for example, which I played pretty much aswell. It's just the healing surge and water shield/earth shield that makes big difference, a 19 shaman only have one thing of that.

Shamans need to be pointed out more then hunters though because all they need to do to be good is es shear and fake cast. Hunters atleast need to manage pet pool focus use multiple cc's while kiting along with having to worry about getting there opponent in the open to burst. Hunter bieng op @ 19 has no relevance to 20s. Rogues feral Druids paladins shamans and priests are all quite capable of dealing with hunters.

 

[Shft]

Shamans need to be pointed out more then hunters though because all they need to do to be good is es shear and fake cast. Hunters atleast need to manage pet pool focus use multiple cc's while kiting along with having to worry about getting there opponent in the open to burst. Hunter bieng op @ 19 has no relevance to 20s. Rogues feral Druids paladins shamans and priests are all quite capable of dealing with hunters.

Its funny to me that after I powershift a concussive shot and a hunter has no scatter/intimidation/web they continue to hold the s key instead of changing direction while I mangle their backside. However, after sitting in a full web and a full scatter I'm not going to have much of a chance, terribad hunter or not. But if i opened and i choose to trinket, gg

 

[Elusieve]

I voted hunter (though I haven't tried any other class in this particular bracket). I haven't seen anyone question that hunters are OP, and that people get frustrated about how things stand is perfectly understandable. However, I do find it tiresome that people keep confusing class balance with skillcap and some supposed degree of fun. The first have very little to do ith the other two; someone who finds a challenge in surviving 1v1-encounters when playing a crappy class may very well find a corresponding challenge in single-handedly taking out an efc with a healer when playing an OP one. You have to be multi-boxing or playing a lvl 24 hunter to risk not finding a challenge, if a challenge is what you are looking for. If anything, the same abundance of tools that often makes a class OP contributes to an increase in skillcap, and playing a powerful class provides a certain freedom which shifts the focus from the 1v1-encounters to more interesting and strategical aspects of the game. Anyway, one who claims to be playing this game mainly because of the intellectual challenge should probably think twice before questioning the intellectual abilities of others. The one thing that feels lamer than winning just because of your class is losing just because of your class. (Personally I feel that an appropriate hunter nerf would be one targeting our hp, making us glass cannons, something which would also emphasize the offensive hit-and-run role which I like about he class.)

 

[Shockur]

Hunter has highest skill cap and lowest skill floor.

 

[barthilastwink]

Getting owned and then making a hunter isn't an arguement or a excuse ^^

please take note to reread my statement its not just getting owned its getting owned by 24s