Juicy said:Curley's alright in my book. He's definitely an above average player.
curleypwnsu said:quelf maybe my SF proced
Juicy said:I live in an historic building with crappy old wiring. Even when I don't use the wireless router I have an intermittent signal. Just something I've learned to deal with.
Hamcake said:A historic*
Hamcake said:A historic*
Kore nametooshort said:historic starts with a hard consonant sound, therefore its indefinate article is a rather than an. An is used when the preceeding word starts with a vowel sound in order to seperate the vowel sound from the a to stop it becoming distorted. Also Just because people choose to type it incorrectly doesnt make it right.
Grabco said:don't be stupid^
A quick bit of Googling reveals that — as of December 2008 — the phrase a hypothesis is used on 2.22 million pages (80%), and an hypothesis on 538,000 pages (20%). Similarly, a historic gets 70% of the popular vote, and an historic only 30%.
There is a clear preference on the web in favour of a hypothesis and a historic. Even so, a significant minority uses the other form. This supports the view that both forms are widespread. Which form you use seems to be little more than a personal preference and perhaps a matter of accent.
In summary: A historic is more common in online writing, but both usages are sufficiently common to be considered correct.
reference:
"A historic" or "an historic"?
In my own summary only fix mispellings or hard grammar rules rather than forcing your personal preference on people.
ArthurianKnight said:almost seems like "A historic" means one precise historic while the "an historic" seems much more like it points to a general historic without any real precision in it. beside that, i'm totally lost, my teechers always told me to put "AN" in front of vowels only !
this seems to be the exception to the rules...
true, "an historic" sounds better though.
Quelfep said:![]()
Rogues and their 30yd range melee abilities...
Grabco said:SF proc for 86 damage clearly not a crit?
Orcgasm said:(doesnt seem likely since SF procs dont hit for 89 damage
my action bars were all screwed up need to fix themQuelfep said:I fake casted him twice in the same fight
It didn't. Look at the picture. It was a melee attack, if you can see my toon.