Best of 19s

of course hes in top 25% of 19 hunters. you just basically gave him a compliment and shitted on him in the same thing. the top 25% of hunters @ 19 is literally 1/4+ in % of the hunters, since there isnt 100 active hunters even as of now.

even @ Level cap, iirc like 2000 rating is within like the top 2% for arena or some shit like that. Around the same time that statistic was shown, gladiator was the top 0.5% of arena teams. whether any of those #'s in this are still up to date is entirely up in the air and probably not the same as far as i know, but that was just to give a bit of an idea what top 25% is, many a bad hunter are in that too.

point of my post being, practically most 19 hunters that people even know the name of, are in the top 1/4 (25%)

Oooooh I see. I didn't know that top 25% meant top 1/4. Thanks for straightening me out.
 
Hey! thanks to everyone who thinks I am one of the best. But just because some of them don't think i'm the best, does not mean they are wrong. Different players mesh better with different hunters. Everyone has their own opinions and i am sure they have evidence and reasons why. =) All I can hope for is to learn how to tweek my play a little bit depending on who I am playing with! =)
 
For sure. I'm not saying your bad hop. Hope u get that.

Totally understand man, like i think i listed Offthehookg and Skeezin on my BM list. I don't expect to make every list. Different people appeal to different people. Just how the mind works =)
 
Hunter: Redfish
 
Phobia literally won the first queue pop of the day yesterday by making a call to go enemy roof and gauntlet after he got pushed out of defense by a big group. He ran from our FR to EFR picked flag himself and made the call for us all to come enemy roof. Macro game on point.

If you think Phobia isn't in the top 25% of hunters, you're a hater.

Just sounds like a wantabe Discover
 
Oooooh I see. I didn't know that top 25% meant top 1/4. Thanks for straightening me out.

i honestly have no idea what I was saying in that post really, came back to it just now when sober & clearheaded. wtf is all i can say, what a delete-worthy post.

my original intent was likely to say that saying phobia is a 1 in 4 skill level hunter is a disservice to that persons skill, more likely is a 1 in 10 hunter in the 19s.

my b
 
i honestly have no idea what I was saying in that post really, came back to it just now when sober & clearheaded. wtf is all i can say, what a delete-worthy post.

my original intent was likely to say that saying phobia is a 1 in 4 skill level hunter is a disservice to that persons skill, more likely is a 1 in 10 hunter in the 19s.

my b
what u were saying is that being a top 25% hunter is nothing great, it doesnt even mean that u are decent. in this bracket u can be a top 25% hunter and still be garbage.

which is a good point.
 
what u were saying is that being a top 25% hunter is nothing great, it doesnt even mean that u are decent. in this bracket u can be a top 25% hunter and still be garbage.

which is a good point.

^^^this, i was faded so it was phrased very drawn out and in a way that was prone to being easy to respond in the way that the dude who quoted me did so i didnt like the post. you said it in a succinct enough way. to say 1/4 players is within a good percentile of skill level, in 19 hunter, doesn't say much at all for the person being described.

thx 4 the help arkant
 
It also depends on who you even classify as members of the bracket. Should some guy who isn't serious about twinking and barely plays be included in that number? How about alt hunters who are not played so much? There are other exceptions too, but to say that someone is in the top 25% of truly active main hunters really means that they're one of the better ones.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top