Omgimarogue
OG
Twinkytoes said:I will definitely will not stop twinking.
amen
hopefully we'll get AB and EotS. Then noone would play WSG anyway
Twinkytoes said:I will definitely will not stop twinking.
canihascookie said:thats fine, now its a race to see who can get 1 cap... lol
Twinkzruz said:I'm sorry to have to bring this up, but apperantly all of you are arogant and dont see what the patch notes REALLY say.
They said, in the event of a tie, that the NEXT person to cap would win, so if its 0-0 and reaches the 20 minute limit, it will go on untill 1-0, And same goes with 1-1 and 2-2, so The new goal is to cap atleast ones before 20 minutes and keep the enemies from capping in that time, or if its a good 10v10, it will be a 1 cap game all the time, making it more interesting, these games can STILL last for hours.
Its not like if its a tie their going to close the BG? What would the title say at the top? Fuck that, read the patch notes better.
Grunge said:im prolly gonna head to 29's, i want a mount and priests kinda suck at 19's now.
Demøniç said:I would prefer that WSG ended immediately after one team captures a single flag to the 20 minute version. Both versions feature a race for the first flag, but at least in the second one I don't have to sit in the BG until the timer is up when I have almost no hope of winning. Don't get me wrong, 1 cap wins would still suck compared to the current format. It's just that a timed BG where one team essentially wins before its half-way point seems like a total waster of time.
In short, the contest for the first flag will be fun. Waiting for the BG to end after the first flag has been capped, however, will be terrible.