An easy way to bring the nerf to hunters that BGs crave...

if this happened, hunters would bcome utterly useless in 80 arenas and that's pretty much all that matters to blizz.
 
Strydar said:
You know - you might actually get me to back you up with your statements - if you didn't play two Paladins... Tell me that with their endless mana, bubbles galore and their Jesus-heals that they're not OP. Please - no sympathy from this hunter. I'll continue to laugh at the hypocrisy of those that call out for nerf on any class they can't beat one on one - better known as the nerf herder.



You know - I hate that a lock with a Spell Power or Shadow Wrath build can hit me with three DoT and drop me unless I'm hanging around a healing hut... but I do not call for the nerf - I know to just stay away from certain classes b/c when playing a certain class b/c we don't match up well against them...





@Strydar



THANK YOU



Enough Said





For all you people out there who keep QQ'ing, l2 live with it, some classes are better at fighting other classes, just live with it and keep playing, Blizz will never listen anyway, They'll overnerf something at 80, which will kill a classes twinking output for a while, then when enough people at 80 qq they'll overbuff it without looking, what you need to learn is, blizzard are dumbasses, plain and simple, its the pros and cons of a game, I'm sorry life isnt perfect.
 
Strydar said:
You know - you might actually get me to back you up with your statements - if you didn't play two Paladins... Tell me that with their endless mana, bubbles galore and their Jesus-heals that they're not OP. Please - no sympathy from this hunter. I'll continue to laugh at the hypocrisy of those that call out for nerf on any class they can't beat one on one - better known as the nerf herder.



You know - I hate that a lock with a Spell Power or Shadow Wrath build can hit me with three DoT and drop me unless I'm hanging around a healing hut... but I do not call for the nerf - I know to just stay away from certain classes b/c when playing a certain class b/c we don't match up well against them...
I clearly stated my point with which anyone has yet to disagree (l2read if you're not sure to which point I am referring) and I still get ad hominen and straw man from epeen-strokers.



The classes I really enjoy playing are warriors, priests, and high-level fire mages. I also like paladins, and they also happen to be one of the only classes that has a good chance to beat a hunter in an isolated one-on-one. If hunters weren't such a problem, I probably wouldn't have made a 29 paladin.



Gradius was already over 40 when I decided to make a 49.



Regardless, if you think my idea is good, why would fret about my "merit?" Sounds like you're just desperate to pick a bone with someone about this topic. Offload your angst somewhere else, will ya?



Now if you'd like to actually discuss the topic of the thread, I'd be more than happy to consider your thoughts.
funnyman said:
@Strydar



THANK YOU



Enough Said





For all you people out there who keep QQ'ing, l2 live with it, some classes are better at fighting other classes, just live with it and keep playing, Blizz will never listen anyway, They'll overnerf something at 80, which will kill a classes twinking output for a while, then when enough people at 80 qq they'll overbuff it without looking, what you need to learn is, blizzard are dumbasses, plain and simple, its the pros and cons of a game, I'm sorry life isnt perfect.
For the most part, read the above. Otherwise if you don't think discussing class balancing is worth doing then why are you bitching about it?
Ramune said:
if this happened, hunters would bcome utterly useless in 80 arenas and that's pretty much all that matters to blizz.
Already answered :)

fuzzles said:
Plus this could be fixed with a trainable skill or talent but fat chance of Blizzard focusing that much on low level PvP >.>
Now that they've put enough effort into support for twinks to set a precedent, who knows; it's possible.
 
Jump, Jump, Jump, Concussive Shot when you hit the ground, go back to 1.

Not gonna help unless you give Concussive Shot a cast time.
 
Good point, all though it will help some; the hunter won't cover quite so much distance since he has to hold still for a fraction of a second to shoot. In that fraction crippling poison or hamstring could hit. Not to mention the loss to dps.



Pet will still be wailing on ya. It wouldn't end the hunter's ability to kite, just keep it from being impregnable imo.
 
fuzzles said:
Good point, all though it will help some; the hunter won't cover quite so much distance since he has to hold still for a fraction of a second to shoot. In that fraction crippling poison or hamstring could hit. Not to mention the loss to dps.



Pet will still be wailing on ya. It wouldn't end the hunter's ability to kite, just keep it from being impregnable imo.



2 Second Cast with 1 Second Reduction with talents seems like it would work out to me.
 
0.0 that's pretty harsh but I'd be interested to see how it would turn out. And not just to giggle while slicing through hunters lol
 
Losing to a hunter who wins with full HP is harsh.
 
Rip said:
Just give us LOS in WSG and Hunters will be fine.



Only in mid, which is useless for many occasions.
 
the simplest and incredibly obvious way to nerf 19 and 29 hunters is to not make disengage learned until 30.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top