Amazing Idea for que times

[Stamm]

What if Blizzard implemented a que time for classes like they did for factions. Only allowing 1 each per game is impossible, but maxing at 2 of each class in a game would allow the underplayed classes to get in faster, and reduce the madness of up to 6-7 hunters a game.

This would encourage rolling classes few people play. Dps casters. warriors. shamans. I'm writing this as I give up hope in a pug with horde having 4 hunters, 3 rouges, a pally, a mage, and a priest.

This would only be applicable for pugs.

Thoughts?

 

[Klinda]

I'm writing this as I give up hope in a pug with horde having 4 hunters, 3 rouges, a pally, a mage, and a priest.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE don't act like the alliance isn't the same way. I don't know the exact statistics and i'm sure know one else knows but i'm pretty positive the alliance has a PLETHORA OF HUNTERS on their side.

and to your statement i think that would make q's longer for a number of reasons, in theory it could work out but it probaly wouldn't because we all know how blizz is

 

[Stamm]

Alliance has just as many if not more. I understand how it would lengthen que times in the beginning, but i think it would even out in about a month when people l2p classes that don't have autoshot.....

 

[MarzRider]

What if Blizzard implemented a que time for classes like they did for factions. Only allowing 1 each per game is impossible, but maxing at 2 of each class in a game would allow the underplayed classes to get in faster, and reduce the madness of up to 6-7 hunters a game.

This would encourage rolling classes few people play. Dps casters. warriors. shamans. I'm writing this as I give up hope in a pug with horde having 4 hunters, 3 rouges, a pally, a mage, and a priest.

This would only be applicable for pugs.

Thoughts?

Your only complaining about 4 hunters, 3 rouges, 1 PALLY, a mage and a priest?!?!?!??!
If I saw a Alli team like this I would be "jumping for joy"


However your idea seems somewhat decent although my guess is it would add a fair amount of time to our fast queue times. (well if your on horde)

 

[Lecavalier]

Your only complaining about 4 hunters, 3 rouges, 1 PALLY, a mage and a priest?!?!?!??!
If I saw a Alli team like this I would be "jumping for joy"

Get real, normal Alli teams are 6+ hunters 2-3 pallys, and however many rogues. I think you guys have it a little better than our side.


However your idea seems somewhat decent although it would add to our queue times.

He's complaining about teams with six Hunters. Learn to read plox.

What if Blizzard

Stopped reading there.

But seriously; in this bracket, seeing so many Hunters in a battleground is something casual you should grow accustomed to.

Blizzard already has issues balancing PvP in it's most competitive niche (level 85, obviously), in which case, you would be paying for the game.

 

[Deadvulcano]

This sounds strangely familar Battlegrounds need a class cap - Forums - World of Warcraft

 

[Sofabedx]

I dont mind if im playing 10 hunters or with 10 hunters, i just want faster Qs for alliance so i can enjoy the aspect of being in a warsong ... But dont worry my loves im making a horde so i dont have to QQ much more about qs <3

And that idea sounds fair... But really screwing over the people who spent all their time on classes like priest/hunters/paladins and it would totally screw up premades by limiting what you could play with. But i would love the instant q on my lock that this great idea would give me

 

[Deadvulcano]

[...] But dont worry my loves im making a horde so i dont have to QQ much more about qs <3 [...]

lol, too bad that got locked, most fun I've had on these forums in awhile

 

[Sofabedx]

lol, too bad that got locked, most fun I've had on these forums in awhile

Point of life is to have fun man glad i could help out. and i dont want people to be mad at me, cuz at the end of the night. I like you all. without you there wouldnt be a 20-24 bracket

 

[Mialo]

This sounds strangely familar Battlegrounds need a class cap - Forums - World of Warcraft

Indeed. This has been suggested before.

 

[Cellebate]

I know we've all thought this before, but would your team composition matter more than a minimum health? Because I could support a class diversity policy for ques only if there was a minimum health requirement. The reason why I don't usually like seeing the underplayed classes on my team is because usually people don't take the time to gear them. Most of the time you know how much health someone will have before you even select them just based on their class and maybe their name.

 

[Stamm]

/sigh

If an 8 page long thread on their site didn't do diddly, I suppose you might as well lock this thread and let it sink into oblivion....