not really, I enjoy 64 alot more then 60 tbh... because of several items you can obtain.
So stop the hating lol
And BTW its 60-69 so just be quiet, its not 60 * only... sir.
And I didn't make my character to beat level 60's, i just enjoy it alot more.
The only reason why 64 is being hated is because All the level 60 twinks out here get to much attention they think they are in the middle of attention and the bracket is only for them
Well your wrong, and thats the disadvantage of having 4 level differences in a bg bracket
There is no flaming towards all the other highest level brackets either ?
the only reason is because these just want to stick to 60, well thats your decision.
If i had a chance to change the bracket I would gladly make it 60-69 and i would still stick to 64.
And most of the time I'm not even after the level 60's, only if they attack me lol.
I tried 60-64 bracket gave up as soon as i saw all the lvl 64s so yes your ruining the bracket and the only reason to play a lvl 64 over a 60 is that you want to have a huge advantage over the most common level in the bracket which is the only thing sustaining that bracket. Oh yeah and i forgot that when people have a legitimate arguement for not liking something that's ruining something they enjoy simply because you want to play something that's huge amounts easier it is hating. Im sure your someone who would roll a 24 hunter in the f2p bracket to then claim that it ruins the game in no way while you backpeddle into a wall.not really, I enjoy 64 alot more then 60 tbh... because of several items you can obtain.
So stop the hating lol
hm, either its a bad troll or it really is an incredibly stupid little kid.. anywho leichnam and bwappo i wuld highly recomend not waisting your time on witch ever this is cus it wuld seem that his reasoning is flawless................................
I tried 60-64 bracket gave up as soon as i saw all the lvl 64s so yes your ruining the bracket and the only reason to play a lvl 64 over a 60 is that you want to have a huge advantage over the most common level in the bracket which is the only thing sustaining that bracket. Oh yeah and i forgot that when people have a legitimate arguement for not liking something that's ruining something they enjoy simply because you want to play something that's huge amounts easier it is hating. Im sure your someone who would roll a 24 hunter in the f2p bracket to then claim that it ruins the game in no way while you backpeddle into a wall.
Your really dancing around the issue. No i cannot read your mind but 20-24 is basically the same as 60-64 thats very contradictive of you especially when there doing the same thing as you are.You cannot read my mind so stop trying to say what i will do.
secondly, i hate 24 twinks
enough said.
dont tell someone on what lvl they can or cant lock XP, the bracket is 60-64 so he isnt cheating or anything.
Yet everything he said is relevant and true. Also, no one asked for you to turn up and start forum-policing every valid point raised in this thread either, but cest la forums eh.Again, he didn't make this threat for a anti 64 campaign. He is asking for 64 armories..
Yet everything he said is relevant and true. Also, no one asked for you to turn up and start forum-policing every valid point raised in this thread either, but cest la forums eh.
Either way, 64s are indeed ruining the bracket, leaving it half-empty yet full of wankers. I myself stopped queueing a while back because of this reason, and don't intend to do it much anymore until a bit more balance is restored.
So let's leave out the unconstructive criticism aimed at complete non-issues, and focus on the real point at hand: 64s and their very real need to disappear from the bracket. Waddaya say?
Go for it. On topic: don't have any 64 armories to share, sowwy.I say take it to another thread. Yes, the criticisms of 64s are relevant and true, but are not the whole truth. If you want, I'll start the other thread for you, so that we can stop violating the TI Code of Conduct by derailing this thread.