EU+US 60 Ret twink

[Froobster]

Hey guys for 60 ret twinks on soc gear do you wanna socket Crit / Str / or Vers for your ret twink???

 

[Allybeboba]

I would think STR to a certain point then a secondary stat.
At least that is what I do with my healers.

/cheers

 

[Froobster]

Thanks

 

[Anonymous]

I think you almost always gem for your main stat

So I would go STR

 

[Froobster]

Well not true cause Warrior's scale really well off Vers. they get Ap from the vers.

 

[Glorifyd]

Str > Vers> Crit

there are some break points in Crit that you will want. 15% being the key if u arnt going Crit TV build. If you are 25% is breaking point.

 

[Captain]

I miss 60s...

 

[Glorifyd]

Also to expand, there are haste/str builds that some people like as Ret. I personally dislike it, but it can be a more Glass Cannon style choice.

 

[Veechard]

Also to expand, there are haste/str builds that some people like as Ret. I personally dislike it, but it can be a more Glass Cannon style choice.

I’ve found pure haste stacking ret is very good for survival in Wpvp situations. If I get them in a full stun lock I can spam like 4-5 flash heals for nearly full health, and by the time stun is back up, because of mana regen from having so much haste, I can do it again. Currently I’m prot but would like to switch to ret once I get my hammer. Almost exalted and still no eye. ><

 

[Glorifyd]

HoR sucks tho :/

 

[challe]

I personally like pure strength but i mainly run strength>haste and it seems to be one of the more fun builds out there imo.

Heres my armory link if you wanna check it out I run 400 str as a soft cap then dump into haste.
https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/character/blackrock/looney

 

[Glorifyd]

If you are going Haste, do not go ES. The point of Haste is to have a smooth and faster Zeal->TV uptime instead of the small windows where you have nothing to do when you go more Crit style.

Haste Stack --> 1/1/x/2
Crit stack (25% min) --> 2/3/x/1
Vers stack --> 1/2/x/2

Typical builds.

 

[Anonymous]

make a set for each