Gusys said:Hello, I'm wondering if 29 sp is more damage than 30 spellpower. This is in regaurds to weapon enchants.
Gusys said:Hello, I'm wondering if 29 sp is more damage than 30 spellpower. This is in regaurds to weapon enchants.
Painaid said:I've simplified the +29 and +30 debate into this math equation:
((3x^2 - 27)/4) * ((8x^2)/(9 - 3x)) / ((x^2 + 3x)/6)
(3(x^2 - 9)/4) * ((8x^2)/(-3x + 9)) / (x(x + 3)/6)
((24x^2)(x - 3)(x + 3))/(-3(x - 3)) / (x(x + 3)/6)
((-8x^2)(x + 3)) / (x(x + 3)/6)
((-8x^2)(x + 3)) * (6/(x(x + 3)))
((-48x^2)(x + 3))/(x(x + 3))
-48x
((3x^2 - 27)/4) * ((8x^2)/(9 - 3x)) / ((x^2 + 3x)/6) = -48x
And after working it out, it appears +29 and +30 spell power cancel each other out.
Your best bet is probably to go with +15 strength to increase your melee dps and block value.
Gusys said:Hm, I dunno, according to Throwed you do more damage with 29 but less healing? can anyone confirm this i would think a level 1 dummy test would suffice
Gusys said:Hello, I'm wondering if 29 sp is more damage than 30 spellpower. This is in regaurds to weapon enchants.
Mealstrom said:Oh man I just went on my retired 19 UD priest who has 29sp on seer and my minblasts and smites did around 50 more than on my human who sports 30sp on seer, however my heals were a fair bit lower even though I had the exact same gear and chants, weirddddddddd!
edit:DID ANY OF YOU GUYS EVER THINK TO SWAP BETWEEN A 29SP AND A 30SP WEAPON, FOR THE HEALZ FROM 30 AND DEEPZ FROM 29!?
Mealstrom said:Basic math is tough.
you seem like a good tester, can you please go to tharamore and test this out? my chars are only horde. Horde ftw! For the horde!Eliot said:Well obviously this is too much math, I'd just put icey weapon or beastslaying onto your weapon and you're good to go.
Hope this helps!
this seems really likely, do you have any math or tests or proof to back this up?Twinkzruz said:It's because it's 29 spellpower and the scripting for the other one is 30 healing power. Which is less SP but more healing.
Twinkzruz said:This, and the other guy that said
"Well obviously this is too much math, I'd just put icey weapon or beastslaying onto your weapon and you're good to go.
Hope this helps! "
are making themselves out to be the idiots in this thread, not the person that made the thread.
By saying these things your just being assholes and proving that you don't know anything about the technicals of twinking : /
Twinkzruz said:This, and the other guy that said
"Well obviously this is too much math, I'd just put icey weapon or beastslaying onto your weapon and you're good to go.
Hope this helps! "
are making themselves out to be the idiots in this thread, not the person that made the thread.
By saying these things your just being assholes and proving that you don't know anything about the technicals of twinking : /
Gusys said:For those who think im joking, check out the facts, throwed and maelstrom have almost proven this to be a fact.
Twinkzruz said:This, and the other guy that said
"Well obviously this is too much math, I'd just put icey weapon or beastslaying onto your weapon and you're good to go.
Hope this helps! "
are making themselves out to be the idiots in this thread, not the person that made the thread.
By saying these things your just being assholes and proving that you don't know anything about the technicals of twinking : /
Eliot said:k goma, whatever u say.