Search results

Found it: (1) Gamebreaking bug (Massreport it pls) | XPOff Disregard the thread. (And I should read before writing. Apologies.)

The subject is in the title. Saw a 8k HP warlock in a bg yesterday. No unusual buffs. Is this some new exploit? Or just something doable with wrapped items (I know they are getting fixed)? I didn't screenshot the name / realm, trying to recall it now, but not having much success, will screenshot...

Logged in so that I can like the post above. It's perfect! )))

For the last time. Yes, being able to queue exp-on bgs on f2p is intended. Same for vet. Dominating exp-on bgs on f2p / vet, however, due to them reaping the benefits of being de-facto exp-off even though they are classified as exp-on, is not intended. This is merely a side effect. That this...

Being able to play without a sub is there for two reasons: (a) so that people who don't own the game can try it out, and (b) so that players who owned the game but unsubbed can give it another short spin and then hopefully resub. These are the reasons. Vets / f2p are using this for a completely...

This is a key question indeed. And no, they did not. Some others try to say that they did, but they are changing the subject. Eg, take this response: Point by point: No, GMs blabbering something does not mean anything at all. No, the article on us.battle.net talking that if you don't have a...

The debuff can still be obtained. Saw it.

Nothing weird about being proud of your nation. Much respect to the Chinese players and people, they have a lot to be proud about. And, yes, glance's example was right on point, a systematic all-encompassing approach works wonders.

Nothing changed. 9.1 is still not out. Let's hope it comes out late June or early July (who knows if it will). As regards the state of the bracket, it seems to me that the honeymoon period for the new expansion, including for 20s, is over. Things became more streamlined with less variety. There...

(Thanks to all guys who chimed in on resto druids, I am going to try one based on your posts. I didn't see many good resto druids and the ones I saw were kind of meh, but maybe that's because good resto druids switched to other classes temporarily. Will find out. I love playing druids at max...

Not commenting on your capability, etc, you might be good, you might be not so good, I wouldn't know. But the winrate of 70% in solo queue for a twink seems pretty standard. You get 50% the moment you start pressing buttons simply because factions / premade imbalances either even out in the long...

Such a thesis would be wrong on both counts.

I told you what I play, it's not only a hunter. Hunter is absolutely not the easiest and least challenging things at level 20 by far (easiest to get some kills on, perhaps, but google "easy to play, hard to master" sometime). And I understand that you are salty as all hell, but please control...

I am not sure I get what the purpose of this thread is. I will say this: I only started PVPing on level 20 several months ago. I expected two things - the gameplay being overall less challenging than on level 60, and people mastering it to the level of perfection from long hours of playing in...

It was rather obvious that you would find a new set of excuses no matter what I said. Both of you ignored that the hunter is non-surv (so, no bramble and other scary stuff that the thread cries about), one guy ignored feral, both decided that my priest is going to be disc (not the case). I will...

Hunter (non-surv) and feral. Priest on the way.

They aren't, it's just that they aren't top in the traditional meaning for a healer. (Although I don't know who the hell voted for resto druid. That's got to be a troll, LOL.)

Let the readers of the thread decide who made a fool out of themselves.

New players, don't listen to me, listen to JadeFire and roll hunters with bramble staff.

I don't get it. Isn't it an exploit? Wasn't the stance that exploits are a no-no? Confused signals.