Suggest this to Blizzard. Imporving the Bracket!

[LennywBT]

As the tittle says you have to suggest something to Blizz. P2Ps and F2Ps. Ill post this on the the 20-24 bracket too. I just talked with a GM about this and he said that thats a good idea and he wanted me to make it popular.
OT : The idea is , ARENAS BEGINGING FROM LEVEL 10 or 15,
Reasons :

• THere will also be Conquest Gears for lv 20s if they do it.
• Twinkies will love it.
• The game for this bracket would become E P I C !!! Thats a cool thing, because doing only BGs is annoying.

Want to see my ticket ?
Here :
World Of Warcraft - My in-game issue is not listed here. (Ticket US45115752)
Status: Resolved
(Marked by User)
Lentian Pjeci
Hey blizz , Is it true that there will be rated arenas for every bracket beginig from 10 ? In WoD sure ! That would make the game EPIC and Twinks would Extremely Love IT!
#1
1 day ago
Werzkin
Customer Service Representative
Hey there friend, Game Master Werzkin at your service!

I haven't seen any reports of Arena changes juuuust yet for Warlords, but if that isn't a change, it's certainly a good idea! I think you have very good feedback, however we don't have any way to send this to the game developers from Customer Support. This feedback must go on the forums if its going to be seen by the Development team. You can locate the forums here:

World of Warcraft: Forums - World of Warcraft
Starcraft II: Forums - StarCraft II
Diablo III: https://battle.net/d3/en/forum/

Although you may not see a direct response from the developers they do take this feedback into consideration when adjusting the ranking system, and I think that you may find there are other players who agree with you. The more voices we have for things like this, the more attention it will get!
#2
18 hours ago

Please SUGGEST! ^_^
EDIT:IF you have a paid account , post this on WoW forums.

 

[Brov]

0% chance this will happen, but I could see it on a private server.

 

[SPQR]

THere will also be Conquest Gears for lv 20s if they do it.
Twinkies will love it.

Right.. coz that why i rolled twink. to grind endlessly for new gears...

The only thing there can be done for balance is giving Start Edition accounts their own bracket. and let 24-29 kill themselfs.
It is logical from any way you look at it. But as we all know, blizzard loves logic.

 

[artonkn]

Aren't skirmishes enough for you?

 

[Allybeboba]

Aren't skirmishes enough for you?

Give them an inch, they want a mile.
Translated for non Americans: Give them a centimeter, they demand a kilometer.
/cheers

Sweetsidney

 

[Srs]

I'd ask for raiding, but I really don't want it.

PVP OR DIE!!! °,....,°

 

[vppl]

@ Artonkn
Not for me. 70 lvl is first rated arena bracket, 60lvl is dead. I am sure if they let us play rated arenas on lower lvl, twink brackets are going to be live again.

 

[The Saint]

Suggestion: Remove the ability for trials to enter BGs at level 20. They have enough time to TRY pvp from 10-19.

Right.. coz that why i rolled twink. to grind endlessly for new gears...

The only thing there can be done for balance is giving Start Edition accounts their own bracket. and let 24-29 kill themselfs.
It is logical from any way you look at it. But as we all know, blizzard loves logic.

It's not actually logical to do that. As long as there's a single p2p in the bracket that's 100% more profit than they get from trials.

 

[artonkn]

@ Artonkn
Not for me. 70 lvl is first rated arena bracket, 60lvl is dead. I am sure if they let us play rated arenas on lower lvl, twink brackets are going to be live again.

But they don't want people to stay at low levels.

They are adding skirmishes as a way to level / gain rewards. Consider yourself lucky we should be able to play them while locked.

 

[Aradiel]

Give them an inch, they want a mile.

Firstly, you got that wrong. It's give them an inch, and they take a mile. Secondly, it doesn't apply here. We can only take what we're given, no more. That doesn't stop people wanting more of course.

In this particular instance Blizz simply don't care about making F2P's lives easier, so while it might be a nice idea, the chance of Blizz expressly doing something to make F2P better is exactly 0%. They will change F2P if they feel it directly impacts P2P, by removing XP off, but they have never done a single thing to advantage F2P. Any benefits or detriments have been side effects of their "balancing" something else. Generally at endgame.

 

[The Saint]

Firstly, you got that wrong. It's give them an inch, and they take a mile. Secondly, it doesn't apply here. We can only take what we're given, no more. That doesn't stop people wanting more of course.

In this particular instance Blizz simply don't care about making F2P's lives easier, so while it might be a nice idea, the chance of Blizz expressly doing something to make F2P better is exactly 0%. They will change F2P if they feel it directly impacts P2P, by removing XP off, but they have never done a single thing to advantage F2P. Any benefits or detriments have been side effects of their "balancing" something else. Generally at endgame.

I have to agree with this. When I'm doing business I always look after the guys who don't pay for my services. Their priority's are way out.

 

[FrozenWill]

Firstly, you got that wrong. It's give them an inch, and they take a mile. Secondly, it doesn't apply here. We can only take what we're given, no more. That doesn't stop people wanting more of course.

In this particular instance Blizz simply don't care about making F2P's lives easier, so while it might be a nice idea, the chance of Blizz expressly doing something to make F2P better is exactly 0%. They will change F2P if they feel it directly impacts P2P, by removing XP off, but they have never done a single thing to advantage F2P. Any benefits or detriments have been side effects of their "balancing" something else. Generally at endgame.

So you would be completely fine playing a F2P trial back then when it was a 10 day trial instead of playing endless f2p now then demand that people who pay to play need to get pushed to their own bracket like the rest of the actual twinks? I'm pretty sure give them an inch, they take a mile saying does apply to some f2p's that think they deserve more. Think about this, I pay to play this game, when I lot on my 19 twink I don't get a pop unless it's a set up game night for us twinks, yet if I log on a F2P I get almost instant pops. Just a little something to think about

 

[Goesid]

So you would be completely fine playing a F2P trial back then when it was a 10 day trial instead of playing endless f2p now then demand that people who pay to play need to get pushed to their own bracket like the rest of the actual twinks? I'm pretty sure give them an inch, they take a mile saying does apply to some f2p's that think they deserve more. Think about this, I pay to play this game, when I lot on my 19 twink I don't get a pop unless it's a set up game night for us twinks, yet if I log on a F2P I get almost instant pops. Just a little something to think about

he has a gfd items on his f2p so he did play when it was 10 days.

 

[SPQR]

Remove the ability for trials to enter BGs at level 20.

As long as there's a single p2p in the bracket that's 100% more profit than they get from trials.

<333

 

[FrozenWill]

he has a gfd items on his f2p so he did play when it was 10 days.

I have 4 grandfathered characters that are free to play also and I got those items from the beginning of the 10 day free trial period also.

 

[billy]

WoW is a P2P game, not a F2P game. The trial is for trying the game out.

 

[Allybeboba]

Firstly, you got that wrong. It's give them an inch, and they take a mile. Secondly, it doesn't apply here. We can only take what we're given, no more. That doesn't stop people wanting more of course.

In this particular instance Blizz simply don't care about making F2P's lives easier, so while it might be a nice idea, the chance of Blizz expressly doing something to make F2P better is exactly 0%. They will change F2P if they feel it directly impacts P2P, by removing XP off, but they have never done a single thing to advantage F2P. Any benefits or detriments have been side effects of their "balancing" something else. Generally at endgame.

I don't normally do this but in your case I will make an exception since you went out of your way to correct me. The phrase is correct both ways. Now for your correction.
"In this particular instance Blizz simply don't care" It is doesn't care. tsk tsk....
Have a wonderful day.

 

[The Saint]

<333

I see what you're trying to say, but one is from my PoV, the other is from blizzards PoV.

<3

 

[Zehj]

I don't normally do this but in your case I will make an exception since you went out of your way to correct me. The phrase is correct both ways. Now for your correction.
"In this particular instance Blizz simply don't care" It is doesn't care. tsk tsk....
Have a wonderful day.

its take a mile

depends if you consider blizzard as an "it" or a "they" and seeing as the verb is care it makes more sense to use they

i.e. "they do not care" instead of "it does not care"

 

[Nodoka]

WoW is a P2P game, not a F2P game. The trial is for trying the game out.

Exacly and thats exacly why blizzard pays no attention to this bracket, f2p accounts were never intended to be played like they currently are now.